Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

06:46
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
Saccade reaction time asymmetries during task-switching in pursuit tracking
Hans-Joachim Bieg1, Jean-Pierre Bresciani, Heinrich H Bülthoff
1Department of Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany, hans-joachim.bieg@tuebingen.mpg.de.
Experimental Brain Research
|August 13, 2013
Summary
Smooth pursuit eye movements influence saccadic reaction times (SRTs) for task switching. SRTs were faster when shifting attention in the direction of target motion, regardless of whether eye or oculomanual pursuit was used.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- Task switching involves shifting attention and eye movements between different stimuli.
- Smooth pursuit eye movements are crucial for tracking moving objects.
- Understanding the interplay between pursuit and saccadic eye movements is key to cognitive neuroscience.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how smooth pursuit eye movements impact the speed of saccadic eye movements during task switching.
- To determine if the direction of smooth pursuit affects saccadic reaction times (SRTs).
- To examine whether ocular versus oculomanual pursuit influences SRTs in a task-switching paradigm.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a task-switching paradigm involving smooth pursuit and object discrimination.
- Eye movements were monitored while participants shifted foveal vision between central pursuit and peripheral discrimination tasks.
- Saccadic reaction times (SRTs) were measured for shifts to and from the pursuit task under ocular and oculomanual conditions.
Main Results:
- SRTs showed direction-dependent asymmetries, being generally shorter in the direction of pursuit.
- Reaction times were faster when shifting from pursuit to discrimination if the discrimination object appeared in the motion direction.
- Reaction times were faster when shifting from discrimination back to pursuit if the pursuit target moved away from the fixation point.
- These effects were consistent across both ocular and oculomanual smooth pursuit conditions.
Conclusions:
- Smooth pursuit eye movements create directional biases in saccadic reaction times during task switching.
- Attention and saccade suppression mechanisms likely contribute to these observed asymmetries.
- The findings highlight the integrated nature of smooth pursuit and saccadic systems in controlling visual attention and eye movements.
