Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
Published on: August 2, 2019
Possible s±-wave pairing evidenced by midgap surface bound states in Fe-pnictide superconductors
1School of Science, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, People's Republic of China.
Abstract:
A phenomenological theory of tunneling spectroscopy for Fe-pnictide superconductors is developed by taking into consideration asymmetric interface scattering between particle and holes. It is shown that, consistent with anti-phase s(±)-wave pairing, appreciable zero-energy surface bound states exist on the [100] surface of Fe-pnictide superconductors. However, in contrast to the [110] bound states in d-wave cuprate superconductors, these bound states arise as a result of non-conservation of momentum perpendicular to the interface for tunneling electrons and the s(±) pairing, and hence they can only exist in a small window (~ ± 6°) in the orientation of edges near the [100] direction. Our results explain why a zero-bias conductance peak is often observed in tunneling spectroscopy and why, when it disappears, two coherent peaks show up. These results provide unambiguous signals to test for possible s(±)-wave pairing in Fe-pnictide superconductors.
More Related Videos
09:06Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
04:51Comparison of Two Different Synthesis Methods of Single Crystals of Superconducting Uranium Ditelluride
Published on: July 8, 2021
Related Concept Videos
The Pauli Exclusion Principle
Valence Bond Theory
Valence Bond Theory
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...