Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Dynamic Assessments of Coronary Flow Reserve after Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed tomography: does it
Alexia Rossi1, Anoeshka Dharampal, Andrew Wragg
1Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit at Barts, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Barts Health NHS Trust, The London Chest Hospital, Bonner Road, London E2 9JX, UK.
Insights
A new myocardial blood flow (MBF) index from computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging accurately identifies significant coronary artery disease. This quantitative MBF index outperforms visual CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and quantitative CT (QCT) in detecting functionally significant lesions, especially intermediate ones.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Radiology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Coronary artery narrowing severity is a poor predictor of functional significance, particularly for intermediate lesions (30-70% diameter narrowing).
- Accurate assessment of functional significance is crucial for managing stable chest pain patients and guiding revascularization decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic performance of a quantitative hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) index derived from adenosine dynamic computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging.
- To evaluate the MBF index against visual CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and semi-automatic quantitative CT (QCT) in detecting functionally significant coronary lesions.
Main Methods:
- 80 patients with stable chest pain underwent CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and CTP before invasive coronary angiography (ICA).
- A model-based parametric deconvolution method computed the MBF index (mL/100 mL/min).
- Diagnostic performance was assessed by comparing the MBF index, visual CTCA, and QCT against invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR ≤0.75).
Main Results:
- The MBF index demonstrated superior diagnostic performance with a larger area under the curve (0.95) compared to visual CTCA (0.85) and QCT (0.89) at the vessel-territory level (P<0.001).
- An optimal MBF index cut-off of 78 mL/100 mL/min was identified for detecting functionally significant lesions.
- In intermediate lesions, the MBF index significantly improved specificity (89%) compared to visual CTCA (69%) and QCT (77%).
Conclusions:
- The quantitative MBF index derived from CTP imaging is a superior method for identifying functionally significant coronary lesions compared to visual CTCA and QCT.
- The MBF index provides added diagnostic value beyond anatomical assessment by CTCA, particularly for intermediate coronary lesions.
- This quantitative MBF index holds potential to improve patient management strategies for coronary artery disease.
Aims:
The severity of coronary artery narrowing is a poor predictor of functional significance, in particular in intermediate coronary lesions (30-70% diameter narrowing). The aim of this work was to compare the performance of a quantitative hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) index derived from adenosine dynamic computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging with that of visual CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and semi-automatic quantitative CT (QCT) in the detection of functionally significant coronary lesions in patients with stable chest pain.
Methods And Results:
CTCA and CTP were performed in 80 patients (210 analysable coronary vessels) referred to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The MBF index (mL/100 mL/min) was computed using a model-based parametric deconvolution method. The diagnostic performance of the MBF index in detecting functionally significant coronary lesions was compared with visual CTCA and QCT. Coronary lesions with invasive fractional flow reserve of ≤0.75 were defined as functionally significant. The optimal cut-off value of the MBF index to detect functionally significant coronary lesions was 78 mL/100 mL/min. On a vessel-territory level, the MBF index had a larger area under the curve (0.95; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.92-0.98) compared with visual CTCA (0.85; 95% CI: 0.79-0.91) and QCT (0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.93) (both P-values <0.001). In the analysis restricted to intermediate coronary lesions, the specificity of visual CTCA (69%) and QCT (77%) could be improved by the subsequent use of the MBF index (89%).
Conclusion:
In this proof-of-principle study, the MBF index performed better than visual CTCA and QCT in the identification of functionally significant coronary lesions. The MBF index had additional value beyond CTCA anatomy in intermediate coronary lesions. This may have a potential to support patient management.
More Related Videos
08:13In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
08:35Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT