Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Comparing the quality of crowdsourced data contributed by expert and non-experts
Linda See1, Alexis Comber, Carl Salk
1International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Ecosystem Services and Management Program, Laxenburg, Austria. see@iiasa.ac.at
Crowdsourced land cover data quality is comparable between experts and non-experts for human impact identification. However, experts show higher accuracy in identifying land cover types, suggesting targeted training is needed for crowdsourced environmental data validation.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Remote Sensing
- Geospatial Data Analysis
Background:
- Lack of in-situ environmental data hinders calibration/validation of remote sensing products and model development.
- Crowdsourcing offers a potential solution for increasing in-situ data supply.
- Concerns exist regarding the quality and usability of crowdsourced data in scientific research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality of crowdsourced land cover data from Geo-Wiki.
- To determine differences in data quality between experts and non-experts in remote sensing.
- To assess the suitability of crowdsourced data for scientific research on land cover and human impact.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of crowdsourced land cover validation data from the Geo-Wiki tool.
- Comparison of accuracy between expert and non-expert contributors.
- Investigation of factors influencing data quality, such as consistency and confidence.
Main Results:
- Little difference in expert vs. non-expert identification of human impact.
- Experts demonstrated higher accuracy in identifying specific land cover types.
- Data accuracy improved with contributor consistency and self-reported confidence.
Conclusions:
- Crowdsourced data shows potential for land cover validation, with quality varying by task.
- Targeted training materials and feedback mechanisms are needed to improve non-expert contributions.
- Contributor consistency and confidence are valuable indicators for assessing crowdsourced data quality.
Related Concept Videos
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate + error bound)
The...
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Estimating Population Standard Deviation
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test