Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...

Statistical Analysis: Overview

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Contaminants and Errors

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Stacked multi-fusion CNN: an adaptive attention model for privacy preserving deepfake forensics.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

IReCAPTCHA: a robust image-reasoning CAPTCHA system.

Cybersecurity·2026

Same author

3D Mitochondria Shape Library for Optical Microscopy (3DMSL): A multimodal dataset for deep learning based mitochondrial analysis.

Data in brief·2026

Same author

AI-driven analysis by identifying risk factors of VL relapse in HIV co-infected patients.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

BMWP: the first Bengali math word problems dataset for operation prediction and solving.

Discover artificial intelligence·2025

Same author

GUNet++: guided-U-Net-based compact image representation with an improved reconstruction mechanism.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Fabrication imperfection analysis and statistics generation using precision and reliability optimization method.

Dilip K Prasad¹

¹School of Computing, National University of Singapore, 117417 Singapore. dilipprasad@gmail.com

|August 14, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Precision and Reliability Optimization (PRO) effectively represents shapes in microscopy images. This method enhances detection of image imperfections and provides fabrication accuracy statistics for engineered materials.

More Related Videos

Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins

Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins

Published on: January 17, 2025

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

Published on: July 25, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins

Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins

Published on: January 17, 2025

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

Published on: July 25, 2025

Area of Science:

Materials Science
Image Analysis
Nanotechnology

Background:

Accurate shape representation is crucial for analyzing fabricated structures in microscopy.
Existing methods may struggle to identify subtle image effects and imperfections.
Dominant point detection is key for shape characterization.

Purpose of the Study:

To apply the Precision and Reliability Optimization (PRO) method for shape representation in microscopy images.
To evaluate PRO's effectiveness in detecting image imperfections and assessing fabrication accuracy.
To demonstrate PRO's versatility across various microscopy applications.

Main Methods:

Utilizing the Precision and Reliability Optimization (PRO) method for dominant point detection.
Analyzing the impact of PRO's control parameter on local and global shape representation.
Applying PRO to diverse microscopy images including films, band gap materials, and mirror alignments.

Main Results:

PRO successfully represents shapes by capturing both local and global curvature properties.
The method highlights subtle image effects and imperfections often missed by human observation.
PRO facilitates the generation of fabrication accuracy statistics for large-scale arrays.

Conclusions:

The PRO method offers a robust approach for shape representation and defect detection in microscopy.
PRO enhances the analysis of fabricated structures, improving quality control and material assessment.
This technique is valuable for identifying low-fidelity features and quantifying fabrication imperfections.