Aortic valvoplasty: comparison of the techniques and results of transeptal and retrograde methods

Balloon aortic valvoplasty is used in some patients with aortic valve stenosis who are unsuitable for aortic valve replacement. Complications associated with the retrograde approach can be avoided using an antegrade approach which has been less widely described. Experience of these two methods is reported and aspects of the differences in technique are emphasized. Aortic valvoplasty was attempted in 21 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient 65 mmHg). A significant reduction in gradient was achieved in 20 (mean reduction 59% transeptal group [four patients], 50% retrograde group [16 patients]) with symptomatic improvement in 18 patients which was maintained at follow-up (mean interval of 5.2 months, range 1-17 months) in 8/15 patients. There were only two significant, resolvable early complications and increases in aortic regurgitation were not seen. There were six late deaths but three patients improved sufficiently to undergo successful aortic valve replacement. Aortic valvoplasty provides good palliation of symptoms. In patients who are unsuitable for the retrograde approach the antegrade, transeptal approach is a satisfactory and effective alternative.