Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automatic Placement Within a Hierarchical Clinical Decision Support Terminology.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

DeepSeek R1 Distilled Fails to Perform Well Against the USMLE and Other LLMs with and Without Semantics.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Citizens' Perceptions and Experiences of Self-Measurements in Telehealth - A Case Study.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

From Theory to Empathy: Integrating Human-Centered Design and Lived Experiences in e-Health Engineering Education.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

FURIN Stimulates NOTCH2 and NOTCH3 Pathways, Leading to Return of Function in Aged Cells.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation and use of computerized clinical decision support systems for predicting and managing in-patient clinical deterioration: a systematic review of qualitative research.

International journal of medical informatics·2026
Same journal

The Essential Components and Critical Conditions for Success in a Learning Health System in Oncology.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Scoping Review.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Movement Related Biomechanics in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Review of Reviews.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Surgical Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Posterior Spinal Fusion on Selected Radiological Parameters and Respiratory Function.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Acute Effect of Physio-logic® Exercises on Muscle Tone and Stiffness in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: A Preliminary Study.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Effects of Integrated Music and Occupational Therapy on Motor and Autonomic Function in Children with Neurogenic Scoliosis.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

The usability-error ontology.

Peter L Elkin1, Marie-Catherine Beuscart-Zephir, Sylvia Pelayo

  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|August 15, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Clinical systems can improve patient care but may cause harm due to usability errors. This study introduces the Usability Error Ontology (UEO) to classify and improve documentation of health information technology errors.

More Related Videos

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Medical Informatics
  • Clinical Systems Analysis

Background:

  • Clinical systems are integral to patient care, offering potential benefits but also risks of adverse events due to usability errors.
  • Root cause analysis of adverse events frequently identifies usability issues within Health Information Technology (HIT) or user interactions.
  • Inconsistent documentation of HIT usability errors hinders systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a standardized classification method for Health Information Technology (HIT) usability errors.
  • To facilitate improved and interoperable data capture for usability errors.
  • To present the Usability Error Ontology (UEO) and its application to specific HIT systems.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the Usability Error Ontology (UEO) as a knowledge representation and classification system.
  • Focus on usability errors within Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE), Electronic Health Records (EHR), and Revenue Cycle HIT systems.
  • Anticipation of the UEO's future expansion to encompass additional HIT system types.

Main Results:

  • The Usability Error Ontology (UEO) provides a structured framework for categorizing HIT usability errors.
  • The UEO aims to enhance the consistency and interoperability of error documentation.
  • The presented ontology specifically addresses usability errors in CPOE, EHR, and Revenue Cycle HIT.

Conclusions:

  • The UEO is a foundational step towards standardized documentation of HIT usability errors.
  • Improved data capture and interoperability through the UEO can support better systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
  • The UEO is designed for scalability and future growth to include a wider range of HIT systems and error types.