Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Symptom Tracking in Primary Care: Designing and Testing an EHR-Embedded Safety-Net System.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026
Same author

Physician-expert Insights on the Variable Costs of Delayed Diagnoses Across 6 Conditions.

Journal of patient safety·2026
Same author

Defining Diagnostic Excellence and Missed Diagnostic Opportunity for the Emergency Department Setting.

Annals of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Improving Rates of Cardiac Stress Test Completion through Scheduling Interventions.

The Journal of ambulatory care management·2026
Same author

Thinking critically about AI documentation quality in primary care.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
Same author

First they Came for our AHRQ Articles, then they Came for AHRQ: Scientific Suppression and Struggle in the United States.

International journal of social determinants of health and health services·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Advancing the research agenda for diagnostic error reduction.

Laura Zwaan1, Gordon D Schiff, Hardeep Singh

  • 1Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, , Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

BMJ Quality & Safety
|August 15, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Diagnostic errors are understudied, with varied error rates due to inconsistent methods. Future research needs standardized methods to estimate diagnostic error rates and evaluate interventions for patient safety.

Keywords:
Diagnostic errorsMedical error, measurement/epidemiologyPatient safety

More Related Videos

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics
10:42

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics

Published on: June 17, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics
10:42

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics

Published on: June 17, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Patient safety research
  • Medical error analysis
  • Healthcare quality improvement

Background:

  • Diagnostic errors represent a significant, yet under-researched, aspect of patient safety.
  • Existing research on diagnostic error rates shows considerable variability due to differing definitions and methodologies.
  • Understanding the epidemiology, contributing factors, and interventions for diagnostic errors is crucial for improving healthcare outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize research methods used to study diagnostic errors.
  • To identify gaps and propose future research directions in diagnostic error research.
  • To highlight the need for more rigorous and standardized approaches in the field.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing research methodologies for diagnostic error epidemiology, contributing factors, and interventions.
  • Analysis of limitations in current study designs, including definition heterogeneity and lack of systematic evaluation.
  • Identification of promising areas for future research, incorporating external conceptual models and intervention studies.

Main Results:

  • Epidemiological studies provide estimates of diagnostic error rates, but significant variability exists.
  • Both naturalistic and experimental research settings offer valuable insights into factors contributing to diagnostic errors.
  • Many proposed interventions for reducing diagnostic errors lack systematic evaluation and widespread implementation.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized research methods are essential for accurate estimation of diagnostic error rates across different care settings.
  • Advancing the analysis of diagnostic errors requires integrating newer conceptual models from outside healthcare.
  • Future research should prioritize evaluating interventions, enhancing patient involvement, and utilizing electronic tools to minimize diagnostic pitfalls and improve patient safety.