Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Murine Echocardiography of Left Atrium, Aorta, and Pulmonary Artery
Published on: February 20, 2017
[A comparison between two investigator's difference of results of left ventricular parameters using echocardiography
1Katedra Radiologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Collegium Medicum.
Insights
Cardio Magnetic Resonance (MR) offers more objective cardiac measurements than echocardiography, showing fewer variations between different expert interpretations. This suggests Cardio MR results are operator-independent for evaluating cardiac hypertrophy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Medical Physics
- Cardiology
Background:
- Echocardiography and Cardio Magnetic Resonance (MR) are key cardiology procedures for assessing cardiac morphology and function.
- Primary hypertension with cardiac hypertrophy necessitates reliable imaging techniques for accurate patient management.
- Evaluating inter-observer variability is crucial for determining the objectivity of diagnostic methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the compatibility and objectivity of morphological and functional results from echocardiography and Cardio MR.
- To assess inter-observer variability in left ventricular parameter measurements between the two imaging modalities.
- To determine which method provides more operator-independent results in patients with hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy.
Main Methods:
- 48 patients with hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy underwent both echocardiography (2.5 MHz transducer) and Cardio MR (1.5 T system).
- Two independent evaluations were performed for each imaging modality.
- Standardized software (MASS) was used for post-processing to assess identical left ventricular parameters (e.g., LVDd, LVSd, EDV, ESV, EF, LVM).
Main Results:
- Echocardiography showed statistically significant differences in measurements for multiple left ventricular parameters (LVDd, LVSd, LD, LS, EDV, ESV, EF, LVM) between examiners.
- Cardio MR demonstrated no statistically significant differences in measurements for any assessed left ventricular parameters between examiners.
- This indicates higher objectivity and reduced operator dependency with Cardio MR compared to echocardiography.
Conclusions:
- Cardio MR provides more consistent and objective measurements of left ventricular parameters than echocardiography in patients with hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy.
- The results suggest that Cardio MR is less dependent on the operator, enhancing its reliability in clinical practice.
- Cardio MR is a valuable tool for accurate cardiac assessment, particularly when objective and reproducible data are essential.
Abstract:
The aim of the study is estimation of compatibility between morphological and functional results obtained from two independent evaluations used nowadays in cardiology procedures: echocardiography and Cardio MR. 48 patients were examined (24 fema les and 24 males) from 37 to 75 years of age (mean age was 56 years) with diagnosed cardiac hypertrophy in the course of 2nd and 3rd degree primary hypertension. All patients from this gro up underwent echocardiography exami nation obtained from two independent evaluations, using 2.5 M Hz transducer. Also all the patients underwent Cardio MR examination using MR 1.5 T Signa Excite (GE) system, obtained from two independent evaluations. Dedicated software was used for post-processing (MASS). The same left ventricular mor phological and functional parameters. were assessed in both procedures. Analysis of differences between results obtainedfromtwo independent doctors of the same parameter for each method separately was performed. It was assu med, that the method there were less differences between results obtained from two examiners foreach parameter, was more objective. Statistically significant differences in measurements between different examiners in echocardiography was demonstrated of the following left ven tricular parameters: LV end-diastolic diameter (LVDd), LV end-systolic dia meter (LVSd), end-diastolic long axis (LD), end-systolic long axis (LS), end diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular mass (LVM). No statistically significant differences in measurements between both exami ners in Cardio MR for all measured LV parameters was demonstrated. Cardio MR examination is the procedure, where the result not depends on the operator.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for diagnosing...
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
