Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Measures of Intelligence

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

Critical Thinking

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Control of photosystem formation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Journal of bacteriology·1998

Same author

Cascade regulation of dimethyl sulfoxide reductase (dor) gene expression in the facultative phototroph Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1T.

Journal of bacteriology·1998

Same author

FEESST: a new bedside endoscopic test of the motor and sensory components of swallowing.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·1998

Same author

Left ventricular structure and function in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus: the prospective P2C2 HIV Multicenter Study. Pediatric Pulmonary and Cardiac Complications of Vertically Transmitted HIV Infection (P2C2 HIV) Study Group.

Circulation·1998

Same author

Posttraumatic stress disorder and family functioning in adolescent cancer.

Journal of traumatic stress·1998

Same author

Oxygen regulation of the ccoN gene encoding a component of the cbb3 oxidase in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1T: involvement of the FnrL protein.

Journal of bacteriology·1998

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: January 30, 2026

Critical evaluation of standardized tests.

¹Associate Professor and Chairperson, Occupational Therapy Department, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199.

Occupational Therapy in Health Care

|August 16, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Occupational therapists need to understand standardized evaluations for accurate intervention measurement. Critical evaluation of these tests ensures effective and ethical use of scores, benefiting patient outcomes.

More Related Videos

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: January 30, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Area of Science:

Occupational therapy
Psychometrics
Clinical assessment

Background:

Growing awareness among occupational therapists regarding the need for measurable and documentable interventions.
Standardized evaluations offer uniform procedures for administration and scoring.
Normative samples allow for performance comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

To address key concepts for the critical evaluation of standardized tests in occupational therapy.
To emphasize the importance of examiner proficiency in test administration and interpretation.
To highlight the role of measurement and statistical concepts in ethical test usage.

Main Methods:

Review of foundational principles in psychometrics and statistical analysis relevant to standardized testing.
Discussion of best practices for test administration and score interpretation.
Exploration of criteria for critically evaluating the validity and reliability of occupational therapy assessments.

Main Results:

Standardized tests provide a benchmark for evaluating individual performance against a normative group.
Proficiency in administration and understanding of statistical concepts are crucial for accurate interpretation.
Critical evaluation ensures the appropriate and ethical application of standardized test scores.

Conclusions:

Occupational therapists must possess strong foundational knowledge in measurement and statistics.
Effective use of standardized tests enhances intervention accountability and clinical decision-making.
This article serves as a guide for therapists to critically appraise assessment tools.