Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants
Haresh Kirpalani1, David Millar, Brigitte Lemyre
1Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399, USA. kirpalanih@email.chop.edu
Insights
Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) showed similar outcomes for extremely-low-birth-weight infants. Survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia did not significantly differ between the two noninvasive respiratory support methods.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a significant risk for extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants.
- Minimizing endotracheal intubation via less invasive positive airway pressure is a clinical goal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in ELBW infants.
- To assess the primary outcome of death or survival with BPD at 36 weeks postmenstrual age.
Main Methods:
- Randomized trial of 1009 infants (<1000g birth weight, <30 weeks gestational age).
- Infants received either nasal IPPV or nasal CPAP upon first noninvasive respiratory support.
- Primary outcome: death before 36 weeks postmenstrual age or survival with BPD.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in death or BPD rates between nasal IPPV (38.4%) and nasal CPAP (36.7%) groups.
- Adjusted odds ratio for nasal IPPV vs. CPAP was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.43; P=0.56).
- No significant differences in air leaks, necrotizing enterocolitis, respiratory support duration, or time to full feedings.
Conclusions:
- Nasal IPPV and nasal CPAP demonstrate comparable rates of survival without BPD in ELBW infants.
- Both noninvasive methods are viable options for respiratory support in this vulnerable population.
Background:
To reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely-low-birth-weight infants, clinicians attempt to minimize the use of endotracheal intubation by the early introduction of less invasive forms of positive airway pressure.
Methods:
We randomly assigned 1009 infants with a birth weight of less than 1000 g and a gestational age of less than 30 weeks to one of two forms of noninvasive respiratory support--nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) or nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)--at the time of the first use of noninvasive respiratory support during the first 28 days of life. The primary outcome was death before 36 weeks of postmenstrual age or survival with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Results:
Of the 497 infants assigned to nasal IPPV for whom adequate data were available, 191 died or survived with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (38.4%), as compared with 180 of 490 infants assigned to nasal CPAP (36.7%) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.43; P=0.56). The frequencies of air leaks and necrotizing enterocolitis, the duration of respiratory support, and the time to full feedings did not differ significantly between treatment groups.
Conclusions:
Among extremely-low-birth-weight infants, the rate of survival to 36 weeks of postmenstrual age without bronchopulmonary dysplasia did not differ significantly after noninvasive respiratory support with nasal IPPV as compared with nasal CPAP. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; NIPPV ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433212; Controlled-Trials.com number, ISRCTN15233270.).
More Related Videos
07:15Preoxygenation Techniques for Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Adults Utilizing Oxygen Mask and Noninvasive Ventilation
Published on: December 5, 2025
04:16Inspiratory Muscle Training as an Adjunct to the Treatment of Weaning Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Practical Guide
Published on: January 30, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...