Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026
07:34
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Discrimination, objectification, and dehumanization: toward a pantheoretical framework.
1Department of Psychology, University of Florida, 112250 Gainesville, FL 32611-2250, USA. moradib@ufl.edu
Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation
|August 17, 2013
Summary
This research highlights the importance of understanding dehumanization targets
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Sociology
- Interdisciplinary Studies
Background:
- Dehumanization research has historically focused on perpetrators' perspectives.
- Understanding targets' experiences of dehumanization is crucial for a comprehensive view.
- Existing theories on stigma and discrimination offer valuable insights into dehumanization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To advocate for increased attention to targets' experiences in dehumanization research.
- To integrate theories of stigma and discrimination into the study of dehumanization.
- To propose a pantheoretical framework for understanding dehumanization from the target's perspective.
Main Methods:
- Review and synthesis of theories on discrimination (stressful life events, minority stress, objectification theory).
- Analysis of intersectionality in shaping discrimination and dehumanization experiences.
- Development of a pantheoretical framework integrating discrimination and dehumanization literatures.
Main Results:
- Parallels identified between discrimination theories and emerging findings on dehumanization consequences.
- A pantheoretical framework is proposed, reflecting convergence and complementary integration.
- The framework encourages exploration of discrimination internalization, cognizance, and diverse outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Emphasizes the utility of intersectionality in understanding targets' experiences.
- Suggests a broader range of outcomes beyond individual well-being, including social activism.
- Calls for critical evaluation and refinement of the proposed pantheoretical framework.
Related Concept Videos
02:16Stereotype Content Model
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
00:57Deindividuation
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
01:20Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group effort.
01:30Self Within Cultural Contexts
Cultural frameworks for understanding the self are often categorized into two broad orientations: individualism and collectivism. These paradigms influence how people define themselves, relate to others, and interpret their social worlds. Each orientation offers distinct perspectives on autonomy, responsibility, and the role of the individual within a community.Individualistic CulturesIn individualistic cultures like North America and Western Europe, identity is understood as autonomous and...
01:21Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Physical attractiveness plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal attraction, influencing first impressions, social interactions, and long-term relationship dynamics. Psychological research consistently demonstrates that attractiveness affects social evaluations and behavioral outcomes in various contexts.Influence on Social InteractionsResearch has shown that individuals perceived as physically attractive often experience preferential treatment in social and professional settings. One...