Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Exaggerated intergroup bias in economical decision making games: differential effects of primary and secondary
Steven M Gillespie1, Ian J Mitchell, Ian Johnson
1Centre for Forensic and Criminological Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. S.M.Gillespie@bham.ac.uk
Abstract:
Psychopathic personality traits are linked with selfish and non-cooperative responses during economical decision making games. However, the possibility that these responses may vary when responding to members of the in-group and the out-group has not yet been explored. We aimed to examine the effects of primary (selfish, uncaring) and secondary (impulsive, irresponsible) psychopathic personality traits on the responses of non-offending participants to the in-group and the out-group (defined in terms of affiliation to a UK University) across a series of economical decision making games. We asked a total of 60 participants to act as the proposer in both the dictator game and the ultimatum game. We found that across both tasks, those who scored highly for secondary psychopathic traits showed an elevated intergroup bias, making more generous offers toward members of the in-group relative to the out-group. An exaggerated intergroup bias may therefore represent a motivational factor for the antisocial behavior of those with elevated secondary psychopathic traits.
Related Concept Videos
Dark Triad and Person Perception
Impact of Groups on Groups
Motivational Bias
Correspondence Bias
Fundamental Attribution Error
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior
