Related Experiment Videos
Are we getting informed consent from patients with cancer?
H J Sutherland1, G A Lockwood, J E Till
1Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
|July 1, 1990
Summary
Many patients struggle to understand clinical trial information, often focusing only on risks or misinterpreting probabilities. This can lead to decisions based on incomplete or incorrect data regarding trial participation.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Patient Decision-Making
Background:
- Informed consent is crucial for ethical clinical trial participation.
- Patient comprehension of complex trial information, including risks and benefits, can be a significant barrier.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess patient understanding of pertinent information in a hypothetical clinical trial consent form.
- To evaluate patient interpretation of probability statements within trial contexts.
Main Methods:
- A hypothetical consent form was developed for patient review.
- Patients were asked to identify information pertinent to their trial participation decision.
- Patient interpretation of four distinct probability statements was assessed.
Main Results:
- 74% of 50 patients did not identify both risks and benefits as pertinent.
- Among patients refusing the trial, 70% focused solely on risks.
- Incorrect interpretations of probability statements ranged from 26% to 54%.
Conclusions:
- Patient comprehension of clinical trial consent forms and probability statements is often inadequate.
- Decisions regarding trial entry may be based on incomplete or misunderstood information.
- Improvements in patient education and consent form design are needed to ensure truly informed consent.