Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Giving preschoolers choice increases sharing behavior
Nadia Chernyak1, Tamar Kushnir
1Department of Human Development, Cornell University.
Insights
Children
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Young children exhibit significant prosocial behavior.
- The underlying mechanisms of early altruism remain incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of choice in shaping children's altruistic behavior.
- To test the hypothesis that autonomous, costly choices enhance subsequent prosociality.
Main Methods:
- Three- and 4-year-old children were assigned to one of three conditions: costly choice, noncostly choice, or no choice.
- Children made resource allocations to an individual in need under these conditions.
- Subsequent prosocial behavior was measured by resource allocation to a different individual.
Main Results:
- While most children shared resources, those who made a costly choice subsequently shared more.
- Children in the noncostly choice and no-choice conditions showed less subsequent prosociality compared to the costly choice group.
Conclusions:
- The experience of making autonomous, costly choices appears to foster greater altruistic behavior in young children.
- This suggests children may infer their own prosociality from the difficulty and autonomy of their choices.
Abstract:
Young children are remarkably prosocial, but the mechanisms driving their prosociality are not well understood. Here, we propose that the experience of choice is critically tied to the expression of young children's altruistic behavior. Three- and 4-year-olds were asked to allocate resources to an individual in need by making a costly choice (allocating a resource they could have kept for themselves), a noncostly choice (allocating a resource that would otherwise be thrown away), or no choice (following instructions to allocate the resource). We measured subsequent prosociality by allowing children to then allocate new resources to a new individual. Although the majority of children shared with the first individual, children who were given costly alternatives shared more with the new individual. Results are discussed in terms of a prosocial-construal hypothesis, which suggests that children rationally infer their prosociality through the process of making difficult, autonomous choices.
Related Concept Videos
Persuasion Strategies
Parenting Styles
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative Parenting
This...
Role of Shaping in Operant Conditioning
The steps involved in shaping begin with reinforcing any response that resembles the desired behavior. For example, parents might praise a child for picking up one toy. As...
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Behaviorism
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
Observational Learning

