Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
An analytical approach to assess the predictive value of biomarkers in Phase II decision making
Stavros Nikolakopoulos1, Willem M van der Wal, Kit C B Roes
1Department of Biostatistics and Research Support, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care , University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands. S.N.Nikolakopoulos@umcutrecht.nl
Abstract:
Early Phase II clinical trials typically have a biomarker as a primary outcome. The extent to which a positive result for such a Phase II trial is predictive for Phase III success is of obvious concern. In this article we extend existing approaches for assessing the probability of success in Phase III. We address the case that a dichotomous clinical endpoint of interest is to be measured in Phase III. A Beta prior distribution is suggested that quantifies information from both the data observed on the biomarker and its predictive accuracy. Based on the quantification of the impact of the predictive ability of biomarkers, it is shown that the predictive quality of a biomarker needs to be substantial to support the full development decision. The approach is illustrated with a practical example. A simulation study is presented to illustrate the findings more generally.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...