Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Working memory training in older adults: Load- and phase-dependent changes in brain activation.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same author

Investigating Physical Exercise and Cognitive Training Effects on Cognition and Brain Health in Men and Women with Heart Failure: The ReCARDIO Trial.

CJC open·2026
Same author

Cognition in Chronic Heart Failure: Advancing Knowledge for Better Prevention Through Remote Assessment.

CJC open·2026
Same author

Patient outcomes post self-inflicted traumatic brain injury during the acute phase.

Brain injury·2026
Same author

Coronary Artery Disease Is Linked with Demyelination and Iron Deposition in White Matter Watershed Areas.

Aging and disease·2026
Same author

Model Analysis of the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8: Can Physical Activity Mitigate Cardiovascular Risk Among Low-Income Individuals?

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period.

Maude Laguë-Beauvais1, Christine Gagnon, Nathalie Castonguay

  • 1Université du Québec à Montréal : Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQÀM), C.P. 8888, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8 Canada ; Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, 4545 Chemin Queen-Mary, Montréal, Québec, H3W 1W4 Canada.

Springerplus
|August 21, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Individual differences in neuropsychological tests, like processing speed and flexibility, predict how well people manage two tasks at once. Males generally showed better performance in this dual-task ability.

Keywords:
Divided attentionGenderIndividual differencesNeuropsychological predictorsProcessing speedPsychological refractory period

More Related Videos

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology

Background:

  • Individual differences in cognitive abilities influence task performance.
  • Understanding factors affecting dual-tasking is crucial for cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between neuropsychological test performance and the ability to share attention between concurrent tasks.
  • To identify specific cognitive functions and demographic factors that predict dual-tasking efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Participants (n=20) completed neuropsychological tests and a dual-task paradigm (psychological refractory period - PRP).
  • Reaction times were measured during single-task and dual-task conditions.
  • Multiple regression analysis was used to identify predictors of PRP duration.

Main Results:

  • A shorter psychological refractory period (PRP) was associated with better performance in processing speed, inhibition, flexibility, and working memory.
  • Males exhibited a lower PRP compared to females.
  • Gender, processing speed, working memory, and task-switching ability explained 49.1% of the variance in PRP duration, with gender being the strongest predictor (23%).

Conclusions:

  • Neuropsychological test performance, particularly in processing speed and cognitive flexibility, can predict an individual's capacity for dual-tasking.
  • Gender is a significant factor influencing dual-task performance, with males demonstrating an advantage.