Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography
Published on: April 8, 2019
Magnet-related injury rates in children: a single hospital experience
Chioma Agbo1, Lois Lee, Vincent Chiang
1Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Insights
Emergency department visits for pediatric magnet injuries are increasing, particularly those involving multiple magnets. Mandatory toy standards have not reduced these magnet-related injuries in children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric emergency medicine
- Consumer product safety
- Injury epidemiology
Background:
- Simultaneous magnet ingestion or nasal placement can cause severe tissue injury due to magnetic attraction.
- The effectiveness of mandatory safety standards for toys containing magnets requires further investigation.
- Magnet-related injuries in children represent a significant public health concern.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the emergency department (ED) visit rate for magnet-related injuries in children.
- To analyze trends in magnet-related injuries over time.
- To assess the impact of toy safety standards on magnet-related injuries.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of children evaluated for magnet injuries from 1995 to 2012 in a pediatric ED.
- Case identification via computerized text search and manual chart review.
- Analysis of injury types, magnet numbers, management, and interventions using Poisson regression for rate analysis.
Main Results:
- 112 magnet injury cases were identified; the median age was 6 years, with 54% males.
- Rates of all and multiple magnet-related injuries significantly increased from 2007-2012 compared to pre-2006.
- Swallowed magnets caused 86% of injuries; 12% required endoscopy and 4% surgery.
Conclusions:
- Emergency department visits for pediatric magnet injuries are likely increasing and may be underreported.
- A rise in cases involving multiple magnets was observed.
- Mandatory toy standards did not demonstrate a mitigating effect on magnet-related injuries in this series.
Background And Objective:
The ingestion of multiple magnets simultaneously or the placement of magnets in both nares can lead to serious injury resulting from the attraction of the magnets across the tissues. The impact of mandatory standards for toys containing magnets has not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of the present study was to describe the emergency department (ED) visit rate for magnet-related injuries.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective study of children evaluated for magnet-related injuries from 1995 to 2012 in an urban tertiary care pediatric ED. We identified cases using a computerized text-search methodology followed by manual chart review. We included children evaluated for magnet ingestion or impaction in the ears, nose, vagina, or rectum. We assessed the type and number of magnets as well as management and required interventions. A Poisson regression model was used to analyze rates of injury over time.
Results:
We identified 112 cases of magnet injuries. The median patient age was 6 years (IQR 3.5, 10), and 54% were male. Compared to before 2006, the rate for all magnet-related injuries in 2007-2012 (incidence rate ratio 3.44; 95% confidence interval 2.3-5.11) as well as multiple magnet-related injuries (incidence rate ratio 7.54; 95% confidence interval 3.51-16.19) increased. Swallowed magnets accounted for 86% of the injuries. Thirteen patients had endoscopy performed for magnet removal (12%), and 4 (4%) had a surgical intervention. Magnets from toys account for the majority of the injuries.
Conclusions:
The number of ED visits for magnet-related injuries in children may be rising and are underreported, with an increase in the proportion of multiple magnets involvement. In our case series, mandatory standard for toys had no mitigating effect.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in hospitals have...
Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...
Potential Due to a Magnetized Object
The vector...
Paramagnetism
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...