Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Abbreviated fixed-interval interventions promote self-control in rats.

Behavioural processes·2024
Same author

Active and passive waiting in impulsive choice: Effects of fixed-interval and fixed-time delays.

Learning & behavior·2024
Same author

Mechanisms of impulsive choice: Experiments to explore and models to map the empirical terrain.

Learning & behavior·2023
Same author

Effects of methylphenidate on impulsive choice and delay aversion in Lewis rats.

Behavioural pharmacology·2023
Same author

Effects of the estrous cycle on impulsive choice and interval timing in female rats.

Hormones and behavior·2023
Same author

Junior Faculty Research Career Development in the Era of COVID-19.

Merrill series on the research mission of public universities. Merrill Research Retreat·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Interactions of timing and prediction error learning.

Kimberly Kirkpatrick1

  • 1Kansas State University, United States.

Behavioural Processes
|August 22, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Timing and prediction error learning are interconnected, not independent processes. This bi-directional interaction influences behavior and learning, suggesting integrated neurocomputational models are needed.

Keywords:
Computational modelingMotivationPrediction error learningTiming

More Related Videos

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Psychology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Historically, timing and prediction error learning were considered separate cognitive functions.
  • Emerging evidence reveals a significant interplay between temporal dynamics and prediction error signaling.
  • Temporal variables influence prediction error learning, and prediction errors, in turn, affect behavioral timing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the bi-directional interaction between timing and prediction error learning.
  • To advocate for a neurocomputational approach integrating these two processes.
  • To propose heuristics for developing future computational models.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing neurobiological and behavioral evidence.
  • Conceptual analysis of the interaction between timing and prediction error learning.
  • Development of a neurocomputational framework for theory integration.

Main Results:

  • Timing is fundamental to early conditioned responses and is modulated by temporal variables.
  • Prediction errors, influenced by reward changes, dynamically alter behavioral timing.
  • A bi-directional relationship exists, where timing affects prediction errors and vice versa.

Conclusions:

  • Timing and prediction error learning are intrinsically linked, necessitating integrated theoretical frameworks.
  • A neurocomputational approach, guided by neurobiological data, is crucial for advancing theory development.
  • Future research should focus on developing sophisticated models that capture this interaction for enhanced understanding of learning and behavior.