Language Development
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Attachment
REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
Instinctive Drift
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: May 8, 2026

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
Published on: July 1, 2015
S P Vecera1, M K Rothbart, M I Posner
1University of Oregon.
This study examines how infants develop the ability to choose new locations over previously visited ones, a behavior known as spontaneous alternation. While six-month-old infants show no preference, eighteen-month-olds reliably choose new locations. The findings suggest that different brain networks control these behaviors as children grow.
Area of Science:
Background:
No prior work had fully resolved the developmental trajectory of spatial memory patterns during early childhood. Prior research has shown that rodents demonstrate a decreased likelihood of revisiting specific areas during repeated navigation tasks. That uncertainty drove interest in whether human infants exhibit similar behavioral markers of spatial exploration. It was already known that hippocampal integrity supports these navigation patterns in animal models. This gap motivated researchers to investigate if analogous behaviors emerge during the first years of human life. Previous studies often focused on reflexive responses rather than deliberate spatial choices. Understanding these cognitive shifts remains a challenge for developmental scientists. The current inquiry addresses how these spatial tendencies evolve from infancy to toddlerhood.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study is to characterize the development of spontaneous alternation in human infants. Researchers sought to determine if this spatial behavior emerges consistently during early childhood. The investigation addresses the lack of clarity regarding when infants begin to favor novel locations over previously visited ones. This problem is significant because it informs our understanding of how spatial memory matures. The authors were motivated by the need to distinguish between reflexive and deliberate spatial choices in young children. They aimed to test whether human infants exhibit patterns similar to those observed in rodent models. By comparing different age groups, the team intended to map the timeline of this cognitive milestone. This work seeks to clarify the neural underpinnings of spatial exploration during the first eighteen months of life.
Main Methods:
Review approach involved observing reaching behaviors in two distinct age groups of human infants. The researchers placed identical toys at two specific locations relative to the infant midline. This design allowed for the systematic recording of spatial choices during successive reaching trials. Investigators compared the frequency of returning to a previously visited side against selecting the alternative side. The study utilized these reaching patterns to quantify the emergence of spatial novelty preferences. Data collection focused on identifying differences between six-month-old and eighteen-month-old participants. The team evaluated the relationship between motor inhibition and spatial exploration across these developmental milestones. This systematic observation provided the basis for comparing human spatial behavior with established animal models.
Main Results:
Key findings from the literature reveal that eighteen-month-old infants display a significant pattern of choosing new locations during reaching tasks. In contrast, six-month-old infants return to the same side as frequently as they select a new one. The data show that six-month-olds exhibit inhibition of return but lack the motor behavior associated with spatial alternation. At eighteen months, infants demonstrate both inhibition of return and spontaneous alternation. However, the study indicates that these two behaviors are negatively related at the older age. These results suggest that the underlying mechanisms for spatial exploration undergo substantial refinement during the second year of life. The findings highlight a clear developmental progression in how infants manage spatial information. No significant alternation was observed in the younger cohort during the experimental trials.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that spatial novelty preferences rely on distinct internal processes across different developmental stages. Synthesis and implications suggest that inhibition of return operates under the influence of the posterior attention network. In contrast, researchers argue that spontaneous alternation likely stems from inhibitory control mechanisms within the anterior attention network. These findings indicate that similar behavioral tasks might be governed by separate neural systems. The data demonstrate that motor behavior patterns change significantly between six and eighteen months of age. This shift highlights the maturation of cognitive control during early human development. The study provides a framework for distinguishing between reflexive and deliberate spatial exploration. Future interpretations should consider these distinct neural pathways when evaluating infant cognitive performance.
The researchers propose that spontaneous alternation is linked to the anterior attention network. This mechanism involves inhibitory control, whereas inhibition of return is associated with the posterior attention network. These two systems represent distinct neural pathways for processing spatial novelty in young children.
The study utilizes a reaching task where infants select between two identical toys placed to the left and right of their midline. This approach allows for the measurement of spatial preference without relying on complex verbal instructions or advanced motor skills.
An intact hippocampus is necessary for this behavior in rodents. The authors contrast this with human infants, where they suggest that the anterior attention network is the primary driver of the observed spatial patterns during the second year of life.
The researchers use reaching data to track spatial choices. This component serves as a proxy for cognitive development, allowing the team to compare the frequency of returning to a previous location versus selecting a novel one across different age groups.
The team measures the frequency of returning to the same side versus alternating sides. They observe that six-month-olds show no clear preference, while eighteen-month-olds exhibit a significant pattern of choosing new locations, indicating a developmental shift in spatial memory.
The authors suggest that novelty preference rests on different internal mechanisms even in similar tasks. They imply that cognitive control matures through the integration of distinct neural networks, specifically moving from reflexive inhibition to deliberate spatial alternation.