Coronary revascularization for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction
Jeevan Nagendran1, Colleen M Norris, Michelle M Graham
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Insights
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) offers better survival and fewer repeat procedures than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with coronary artery disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction. This finding aids in managing complex cardiac patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Randomized trials define coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) efficacy for coronary artery disease.
- Patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <35%) are underrepresented in trials, leaving management unclear.
- This study compares CABG and PCI outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term outcomes of CABG versus PCI in patients with coronary artery disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction.
- To evaluate differences in survival rates and need for repeat revascularization between the two procedures.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database.
- Identified 2925 patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing CABG (n=1,326) or PCI (n=1,599) between 1995 and 2008.
- Propensity matching was used to create comparable subgroups for analysis.
Main Results:
- CABG was associated with significantly lower rates of repeat revascularization compared to PCI.
- CABG demonstrated better survival rates at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years post-procedure.
- Independent predictors of poor long-term survival included age, renal failure, heart failure, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, prior myocardial infarction, left main coronary artery disease, and prior CABG.
Conclusions:
- CABG is associated with improved survival and reduced repeat revascularization rates compared to PCI in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.
- Findings are adjusted for baseline risk profile differences.
- Further research is needed to explore factors influencing revascularization modality choice in this complex patient group.
Background:
The efficacy of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease has been well defined by randomized controlled trials. However, patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <35%) were underrepresented in these trials, and management of these complex patients remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing CABG versus PCI.
Methods:
The Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH), a clinical data collection and outcome monitoring initiative for the province of Alberta, Canada, was used to identify 2925 patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing CABG (n = 1,326) or PCI (n = 1,599) between 1995 and 2008. Patients were propensity matched to obtain comparable subgroups among left ventricular dysfunction patients.
Results:
Cox proportional hazard analysis of the propensity-matched subgroups identified that CABG was significantly associated with lower rates of repeat revascularization and better survival compared with PCI at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years. Other significant independent predictors of poor long-term survival included age, renal failure, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, prior myocardial infarction, left main coronary artery disease, and prior CABG.
Conclusions:
For patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction, CABG was associated with lower rates of repeat revascularization and improved survival over PCI, after adjustment for baseline risk profile differences. Further research exploring the factors leading to use of a particular revascularization modality in this patient population is required.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management


