Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Derivatives of Inverse Trigonometric Functions

Derivatives of Inverse Trigonometric Functions

A ship tracking an approaching aircraft relies on geometric measurements to find out the aircraft’s position relative to the observer. By measuring the slant distance to the aircraft and the angle of elevation, the horizontal and vertical components of the distance can be obtained using trigonometric relationships. This geometric approach provides a basis for analyzing how the observed angle changes as the aircraft moves closer to the ship.To examine the mathematical behavior of the angle of...

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The cues in “dependent multiple cue integration for robust tracking” are independent.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2014

Same author

Mean shift trackers with cross-bin metrics.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011

Same author

Tracking by affine kernel transformations using color and boundary cues.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2008

Same author

Bittracker-a bitmap tracker for visual tracking under very general conditions.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2008

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Monotonicity and error type differentiability in performance measures for target detection and tracking in video.

Ido Leichter¹, Eyal Krupka

¹Advanced Technology Labs Israel, Microsoft Research, Microsoft R&D Center, Matam Park, Haifa, Israel. idol@microsoft.com

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

|August 24, 2013

Summary

This study introduces new performance measures for multiple target detection and tracking systems. These novel measures ensure monotonicity and error differentiability, improving evaluation accuracy for video analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Area of Science:

Computer Vision
Machine Learning
Signal Processing

Background:

Numerous algorithms exist for multiple target detection and tracking in video.
Existing performance measures for these systems often lack essential properties, limiting their utility.
Evaluating the accuracy of target detection and tracking is crucial for reliable system performance.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify fundamental properties for effective performance measures in multi-target tracking.
To demonstrate the inadequacy of current measures regarding monotonicity and error differentiability.
To propose a new set of performance measures with improved characteristics for video analysis.

Main Methods:

Analysis of existing performance evaluation metrics for target detection and tracking.
Identification and theoretical argumentation for monotonicity and error type differentiability as key properties.
Development of a novel set of performance measures incorporating these properties.
Empirical validation of the proposed measures using face detection and tracking datasets.

Main Results:

Current performance measures for multiple target detection and tracking often fail to satisfy monotonicity and error type differentiability.
The proposed measures exhibit monotonicity and error type differentiability, enhancing evaluation reliability.
Application to face detection and tracking demonstrates the practical utility and informativeness of the new measures.

Conclusions:

The proposed performance measures offer a more robust and accurate method for evaluating multiple target detection and tracking systems.
Ensuring monotonicity and error differentiability is critical for developing reliable evaluation metrics in computer vision.
These improved measures facilitate better system development and benchmarking in video analysis applications.