Related Experiment Videos
Out of context: clinical practice guidelines and patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review
Kirk D Wyatt1, Louise M Stuart, Juan P Brito
1*Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN †Mayo Medical School, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN ‡Section of Endocrinology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX §Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition ∥Healthcare Policy and Research ¶Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Background:
Poor fidelity to practice guidelines in the care of people with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) may result from patients and clinicians struggling to apply recommendations that do not consider the interplay of MCC, socio-personal context, and patient preferences.
Objective:
The objective of the study was to assess the quality of guideline development and the extent to which guidelines take into account 3 important factors: the impact of MCC, patients' socio-personal contexts, and patients' personal values and preferences.
Research Design:
We conducted a systematic search of clinical practice guidelines for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus published between 2006 and 2012. Ovid Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, EBSCO CINAHL, and the National Guideline Clearinghouse were searched. Two reviewers working independently selected studies, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the guidelines.
Results:
We found 28 eligible guidelines, which, on average, had major methodological limitations (AGREE II mean score 3.8 of 7, SD=1.6). Patients or methodologists were not included in the guideline development process in 20 (71%) and 24 (86%) guidelines, respectively. There was a complete absence of incorporating the impact of MCC, socio-personal context, and patient preferences in 8 (29%), 11 (39%), and 16 (57%) of the 28 guidelines, respectively. When mentioned, MCC were considered biologically, but not as contributors of complexity or patient work or as motivation to focus on patient-centered outcomes.
Conclusions:
Extant clinical practice guidelines for one chronic disease sometimes consider the context of the patient with that disease, but only do so narrowly. Guideline panels must remove their contextual blinders if they want to practically guide the care of patients with MCC.
Insights
Clinical practice guidelines often fail to address multiple chronic conditions (MCC), patient context, and preferences, leading to poor care quality. Guidelines need improvement to better support patients with complex health needs.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Patient-Centered Care
Background:
- Practice guidelines for multiple chronic conditions (MCC) show poor fidelity due to limited consideration of patient context and preferences.
- Patients and clinicians face challenges applying recommendations that don't account for the interplay of MCC, socio-personal context, and patient values.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the quality of clinical practice guideline development.
- To evaluate the extent to which guidelines incorporate the impact of MCC, patients' socio-personal contexts, and personal values/preferences.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of clinical practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes mellitus (2006-2012).
- Independent data extraction and quality evaluation by two reviewers.
- Searches conducted across multiple databases including National Guideline Clearinghouse.
Main Results:
- 28 eligible guidelines had major methodological limitations (AGREE II score: 3.8/7).
- Patients (71%) and methodologists (86%) were largely excluded from guideline development.
- MCC, socio-personal context, and patient preferences were absent or narrowly considered in 29-57% of guidelines.
Conclusions:
- Current guidelines for single chronic diseases offer limited contextual consideration for patients with MCC.
- Guideline development panels must broaden their perspective to practically guide care for patients with MCC.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
Assessment
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Standards of Care II