Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication01:30

Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication

Since the early 2000s, computer-mediated communication (CMC) has grown rapidly, playing a crucial role in self-development. A key distinction between CMC and real-life interactions is the lack of a physically present partner. This absence makes non-verbal cues such as facial expressions, body language, and paralinguistic signals unavailable in CMC platforms like email, instant messaging, or social media. The lack of these cues can create ambiguity and complicate how feedback is interpreted.The...
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
Bullying02:04

Bullying

A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is bullying.
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other01:20

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group effort.
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

XRIndex: a brief screening tool for individual differences in security threat detection in x-ray images.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2015
Same author

The role of expectations, hype and ethics in neuroimaging and neuromodulation futures.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2014
Same author

Prospects of functional magnetic resonance imaging as lie detector.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2013
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

Addressing social resistance in emerging security technologies.

Timothy Mitchener-Nissen1

  • 1Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London London, UK.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|August 24, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Scientists developing security technologies must address public concerns about privacy and ethics early on. Ignoring social resistance risks hindering the adoption and effectiveness of these crucial safety innovations.

Keywords:
ethicsresistancesecuritysocialtechnology

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Sociology of Science and Technology

Background:

  • Governments and law enforcement seek scientific advancements for public safety and crime prevention.
  • Technologies like biometrics and whole body scanners are integrated into the criminal justice system.
  • These security technologies frequently encounter social resistance due to privacy and ethical concerns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the insufficient attention scientists and engineers pay to social resistance concerning security technologies.
  • To argue that early engagement with public concerns can mitigate risks to technology development and deployment.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of social resistance to security technologies.
  • Examination of the impact of public concerns on technology adoption.
  • Proposal for integrating social considerations into the research and design process.

Main Results:

  • Social resistance, driven by privacy, ethics, and function-creep, poses a significant risk to security technologies.
  • Failure to address these concerns can lead to restrictions and bans on valuable innovations.
  • Early identification and mitigation of social resistance are crucial for successful technology uptake.

Conclusions:

  • Scientists and engineers must proactively address public concerns regarding security technologies.
  • Integrating public engagement and ethical considerations early in the design phase is essential.
  • Minimizing social resistance enhances the likelihood of successful deployment and societal benefit from new security innovations.