Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combining demographic and genetic factors to assess population vulnerability in stream species.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2017
Same author

The interaction of perceptual processes and ambiguous sentences.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Sentence reading: a functional MRI study at 4 tesla.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Prior context and the perception of lexically ambiguous sentences.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

H Neville1, J L Nicol, A Barss

  • 1Neuropsychology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|August 27, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to show that the brain processes semantic meaning and grammatical structure separately. Different types of grammatical errors elicit unique brain responses, supporting distinct language subsystems.

More Related Videos

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Language comprehension is theorized to involve separate semantic and grammatical processing subsystems.
  • Empirical data from various studies support this modular view of language faculty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural correlates of semantic and grammatical processing using event-related potentials (ERPs).
  • To differentiate brain activity patterns associated with semantic anomalies versus various types of syntactic violations.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded ERPs from 40 participants reading sentences with semantic anomalies or syntactic violations (phrase structure, specificity, subjacency).
  • Analyzed ERPs for distinct timing and scalp distribution patterns corresponding to different linguistic violations.

Main Results:

  • Semantic anomalies elicited a bilateral N400 potential over posterior regions.
  • Phrase structure violations affected early left anterior negativity (N125) and later left temporal-parietal negativity.
  • Specificity violations resulted in a slow negative potential over anterior left hemisphere.
  • Subjacency violations produced a widespread bilateral positivity.

Conclusions:

  • Distinct ERP patterns for different linguistic violations provide biological evidence for separate semantic and grammatical processing systems.
  • Findings support theories distinguishing grammatical rules and constraints, and the modularity of the language faculty.