Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

04:24
Acupoint Application as a Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment for Fatigue Associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published on: September 5, 2025
Differences in physical functioning between relatively active and passive patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Desirée C W M Vos-Vromans1, Ivan P J Huijnen, Albère J A Köke
1Revant Rehabilitation Centre Breda, Brabantlaan 1, 4817 JW Breda, The Netherlands. d.vos@revant.nl
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
|August 27, 2013
Summary
Therapists categorize Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) patients as active or passive, but this study found no clear differences in physical functioning between these groups. Further research is needed to establish consistent patient subgrouping methods.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) protocols for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) suggest categorizing patients into active and passive subgroups.
- Limited evidence exists to support distinct physical functioning differences between these CFS patient subgroups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate differences in actual and perceived physical functioning between active and passive CFS patient subgroups.
- Utilized baseline data from the multicentre randomized controlled trial (FatiGo).
Main Methods:
- Sixty CFS patients receiving CBT were categorized by therapists based on expert opinion and CBT protocol definitions.
- Actual physical functioning was measured using activity monitors (uptime, activity fluctuations, rest duration).
- Perceived physical functioning was assessed using validated questionnaires (Checklist Individual Strength, SF-36, Sickness Impact Profile).
Main Results:
- Relatively active patients demonstrated significantly higher daily uptime and less activity fluctuation.
- Passive patients reported significantly lower physical functioning and greater functional mobility impairment.
- No significant differences were observed in other measured indices of actual or perceived physical functioning.
Conclusions:
- A distinct difference in actual and perceived physical functioning between therapist-identified active and passive CFS patients was not established.
- Consensus on patient subgroup categorization within CFS requires further investigation.
