Fluidity changes and chemical composition of lipoproteins in type IIa hyperlipoproteinemia

The chemical composition and the physical properties of lipoproteins (VLDL, LDL and HDL) were studied in two groups of patients: 14 healthy normolipidemic subjects and 15 type IIa familial hypercholesterolemic patients. The steady-state fluorescence anisotropy rs was estimated in lipoproteins by the fluorescence depolarization of two fluorescent probes: the DPH (1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene) and the TMA-DPH (1,4-trimethylammonium phenyl-6-1,3,5-hexatriene). A structured order parameter S was calculated from the DPH fluorescence anisotropy. The flow activation energies were calculated for LDL and HDL from both groups from the Arrhenius plots (log r DPH versus 1/T). By using TNBS (trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid) as a distance control quencher, the two probes were located in the outer shell of LDL. In HDL, TMA-DPH remained at the surface of the particles, while DPH was more deeply embedded in the lipid core. There was no difference in the physico-chemical properties of VLDL between the two groups studied. DPH fluorescence anisotropies were significantly increased in LDL and HDL from the hypercholesterolemic group compared to the control particles (P less than 0.05 and P less than 0.01, respectively). In LDL this modification of the fluorescence anisotropy can be related to a change in the lipid composition of particles. LDL from hypercholesterolemic patients contained significantly less triacylglycerol (P less than 0.01) and more cholesteryl ester (N.S.). Their cholesteryl ester to triacylglycerol ratio was significantly higher. In HDL, there was no difference in chemical composition between the two groups. The increase in DPH fluorescence anisotropy can be related to the presence of smaller particles in HDL from HC group. No difference was noted in the TMA-DPH fluorescence anisotropy at 37 degrees C in the LDL from the two groups. In contrast, TMA-DPH fluorescence anisotropy in HDL from hypercholesterolemic group was significantly higher than in control HDL. The flow activation energy of DPH was also significantly higher in both LDL and HDL from the hypercholesterolemic group than in control group particles. In both LDL and HDL from the control group, DPH fluorescence anisotropy was negatively correlated with TG/protein and TG/PL ratios and positively correlated with the CE/TG ratio. No correlation was observed between lipid composition and DPH fluorescence anisotropy values in hypercholesterolemic particles. The modification in fluidity parameters, especially the increase in the flow activation energies in LDL and HDL from hypercholesterolemic patients, could lead to a restriction of cholesterol movements in these particles. From a physiological point of view, this could represent a loss of functional capacity.