Comparison of creatinine and inulin clearances in multiple trauma

Creatinine clearance (Ccr) is a good predictor of renal dysfunction. However, numerous analytical interferences have been observed with the classical measurement of creatinine by Jaffé's procedure. This prospective study was conducted to compare 4 methods for determining creatinine; and also endogenous creatinine clearance with inulin clearance (Cin) to estimate the glomerular filtration rate. The 4 different techniques for measuring creatinine were: 1) 2 techniques using Jaffé's colorimetric reaction: one with rapid and the other with slow kinetics: 2) 2 more selective methods: enzymatic procedure and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Measurements were performed in 13 multiple trauma patients after stabilization and in 5 comatose patients (control group) over a 3-day period, with strict 24-h urine collection. On the second day, inulin clearance and para-aminohippuric acid clearance (Cpah) were measured. Measurement of creatinine by Jaffé's procedure yields significantly higher levels than those obtained by the other methods. Higher levels of both plasma and urinary creatinine were observed in the multiple trauma patients with all the methods used. There were no significant differences in Ccr, Cin, Cpah between the multiple trauma patients and the control patients. The best correlations between inulin clearance and creatinine clearance were observed for Jaffé's rapid kinetics (r = 0.90) in the control group and for the enzymatic procedure in the multiple trauma group (r = 0.55). Plasma creatinine is not a useful indicator in multiple trauma. The correlation between creatinine clearance and inulin clearance is not very strong in multiple trauma, indicating that the relative evolution (not the absolute values) of creatinine clearance is of interest.