Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026
Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
Published on: November 24, 2014
Current status of arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting
1Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Insights
Using multiple arterial grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting improves patient outcomes. Evidence shows internal mammary artery and radial artery grafts offer superior long-term patency compared to vein grafts.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vascular Biology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a standard treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease.
- While arterial grafts offer advantages, single arterial conduits remain the predominant practice in many regions.
- Evidence suggests improved clinical outcomes with the use of multiple arterial grafts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current evidence supporting the use of a second internal mammary artery and/or radial artery graft in CABG.
- To compare the long-term patency rates of arterial grafts versus traditional vein grafts.
- To assess the impact of using multiple arterial conduits on patient clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of existing literature on arterial grafting in CABG.
- Analysis of studies comparing internal mammary artery and radial artery graft patency against vein grafts.
- Evaluation of clinical outcome data associated with different grafting strategies.
Main Results:
- Internal mammary artery grafts demonstrate well-established superior patency compared to vein grafts.
- Radial artery grafts show strong and consistent evidence of superior long-term patency over vein grafts.
- The enhanced patency of internal mammary artery and radial artery grafts translates into improved clinical outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The use of a second internal mammary artery or radial artery graft in CABG is supported by robust evidence.
- Arterial conduits, particularly the radial artery, offer superior long-term patency and improved clinical outcomes compared to vein grafts.
- Increased utilization of multiple arterial grafts in CABG is warranted to enhance patient results.
Abstract:
For over a decade there has been accumulating evidence that the use of more than a single arterial graft during coronary artery bypass grafting can improve clinical outcomes. However the vast majority of patients in most developed countries still only receive a single arterial conduit even in the presence of multivessel coronary artery disease. This review summarizes the current evidence for the use of a second internal mammary artery and/or radial artery graft. While in comparison to vein grafts the superior patency of internal mammary artery grafts is well established, there now exists strong and consistent evidence of the superior patency of radial arteries over the longer term. Likewise, there is a rapidly growing body of evidence that the superior patency of both these arteries in comparison to vein grafts translates into improved clinical outcomes.
