Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensory Modalities01:15

Sensory Modalities

4.0K
Sensation typically is the process by which the sensory receptors and sense organs detect stimuli from the internal and external environment and transmit this information to the central nervous system for processing.
General senses refer to the broad category of sensory information detected by receptors in the body and can be further grouped into somatic and visceral senses. Somatic sensations include touch, pressure, temperature, and pain and are essential for navigating our environment and...
4.0K
Energy to Drive Translocation01:37

Energy to Drive Translocation

2.9K
Mitochondrial protein import is powered by two distinct energy sources: ATP hydrolysis and electrochemical potential across the inner membrane. Newly synthesized precursors are bound by cytosolic chaperones of the Hsp70 family, which guide them to the import receptors on the mitochondrial surface. Utilizing the energy of ATP hydrolysis, Hsp70 chaperones transfer these precursors to the TOM receptors on the mitochondrial outer membrane.
Generally, polypeptides are unfolded by two distinct...
2.9K
Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

82.9K
Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
82.9K
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis02:15

M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis

6.6K
Checkpoints throughout the cell cycle serve as safeguards and gatekeepers, allowing the cell cycle to progress in favorable conditions and slow or halt it in problematic ones. This regulation is known as the cell cycle control system.
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
6.6K
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder01:30

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

1.0K
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. It affects approximately 5-8% of children globally, with around 60-70% of cases persisting into adulthood. ADHD has significant implications for educational attainment, social interactions, and occupational success.
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
1.0K
Transcription Elongation Factors02:35

Transcription Elongation Factors

14.1K
Transcription elongation is a dynamic process that alters depending upon the sequence heterogeneity of the DNA being transcribed. Hence, it is not surprising that the elongation complex's composition also varies along the way while transcribing a gene.
The transcription elongation is regulated via pausing of RNA polymerase on several occasions during transcription. In bacteria, these halts are necessary because the transcription of DNA into mRNA is coupled to the translation of that mRNA...
14.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aging differentially affects memory vividness and remembered salience for emotionally negative images.

Psychology and aging·2026
Same author

Brain structure in the cingulate cortex and locus coeruleus in late life is associated with engagement in complex mental activities across the life span.

Neurobiology of aging·2026
Same author

Dissociable Mechanisms Underlie Differences Between Memory and Metamemory in Older Adults: The Differentiating Role of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms.

Hippocampus·2026
Same author

Sex differences in neuromodulatory subcortical systems and their implications for Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Dopaminergic mechanisms supporting hippocampal postencoding dynamics in humans.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Alzheimer's Disease Pathologies Affect Dopaminergic Neural Mechanisms of Memory.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 13, 2026

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K

Shared and distinct factors driving attention and temporal processing across modalities.

Anne S Berry1, Xu Li1, Ziyong Lin1

  • 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Acta Psychologica
|August 28, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Auditory timing is generally more accurate than visual timing. This study found that while auditory performance suffers from boredom and visual performance from distractibility, both modalities are equally impacted by external distractions, revealing modality-specific attention effects.

Keywords:
AttentionDistractionIndividual differencesInterval timingModalitySustained attention

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2026

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Auditory stimuli are often perceived as longer and timed more accurately than visual stimuli.
  • Existing cognitive models attribute these modality differences to attention capture by auditory information.
  • The specific aspects of attention contributing to these modality effects remain underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different attentional challenges affect auditory versus visual temporal processing.
  • To examine modality-specific and non-specific effects of attention on timing accuracy.
  • To identify individual difference factors (boredom, distractibility) influencing performance across sensory modalities.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized visual and auditory versions of the Continuous Temporal Expectancy Task (CTET).
  • Assessed performance with and without a video distractor to manipulate attentional load.
  • Analyzed performance changes over time to index sustained attention and individual differences.

Main Results:

  • Auditory timing performance was generally superior to visual timing performance.
  • The auditory modality showed less decline in performance due to lapses in sustained attention.
  • Distraction equally impacted performance across both auditory and visual modalities.
  • Individual differences revealed boredom as a key factor in poor auditory timing and distractibility in poor visual timing.

Conclusions:

  • Temporal processing is influenced by both modality-specific and non-specific attentional factors.
  • Different psychological factors (boredom vs. distractibility) underlie individual differences in auditory and visual timing.
  • Understanding these modality-specific attentional mechanisms is crucial for refining temporal processing models.