Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Next-generation Sequencing03:00

Next-generation Sequencing

The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features.
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
What is Population Genetics?01:25

What is Population Genetics?

A population is composed of members of the same species that simultaneously live and interact in the same area. When individuals in a population breed, they pass down their genes to their offspring. Many of these genes are polymorphic, meaning that they occur in multiple variants. Such variations of a gene are referred to as alleles. The collective set of all the alleles within a population is known as the gene pool.
Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Selection-guided discovery in South Asians implicates the MAPT locus in insulin resistance.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Negative frequency-dependent selection: a positive outlook with deep learning.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same author

An ancestry-enriched HNF4A variant and GP2 reveal distinct mechanisms of type 2 diabetes in exome-wide study of 13,674 cases and 41,024 controls.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

On the use of generative models for demographic inference in malaria vectors from genomic data.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

AI solutions for evolutionary genomics of nonmodel species.

Evolution letters·2026
Same author

Identifying Adaptive Footprints in the Presence of Demographic Uncertainty.

Genome biology and evolution·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

Quantifying population genetic differentiation from next-generation sequencing data.

Matteo Fumagalli1, Filipe G Vieira, Thorfinn Sand Korneliussen

  • 1Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720.

Genetics
|August 28, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New bioinformatics methods improve population genetic differentiation analysis from next-generation sequencing data. This approach enhances accuracy, especially for low-coverage genomic datasets, revealing fine-scale population structures.

Keywords:
FSTnext-generation sequencingprincipal components analysis

More Related Videos

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Population Genetics

Background:

  • High-throughput DNA sequencing offers speed and cost-efficiency but faces challenges from bioinformatics-related errors and biases.
  • Naïve methods for identifying polymorphic sites and inferring genotypes can lead to inflated downstream analyses.
  • Genotype call uncertainty is a critical factor in accurate population genetic studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel method for quantifying population genetic differentiation using next-generation sequencing data.
  • To introduce a strategy for population structure investigation via principal components analysis.
  • To address genotype call uncertainty in population genetic analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a novel method for quantifying population genetic differentiation by explicitly modeling genotype probability distributions.
  • Implemented a principal components analysis strategy for population structure investigation.
  • Compared the novel method against genotype calling approaches through extensive simulations.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated marked improvement in estimation accuracy across a wide range of conditions compared to genotype calling methods.
  • Successfully applied the method to a large-scale, low-coverage genomic dataset of silkworms.
  • Inferred fine-scale genetic structure within the sampled silkworm populations.

Conclusions:

  • The novel method effectively quantifies population genetic differentiation from next-generation sequencing data, even at low coverage.
  • Explicit modeling of genotype probability distributions enhances accuracy and resolves genotype call uncertainty.
  • The approach is valuable for investigating genetic relationships and population structure in low-coverage genomic studies.