Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Growth01:27

Relationship Growth

Interpersonal relationships progress through stages, beginning with awareness and moving toward mutuality, where emotional connections deepen. While many relationships remain at moderate levels of mutuality, deeper connections form through self-disclosure, trust, and interdependence.Self-DisclosureSelf-disclosure involves revealing personal information, starting with surface-level details and gradually progressing to more intimate content. As trust grows, individuals feel more comfortable...
Friendships and Close Friendships01:20

Friendships and Close Friendships

Friendship formation is a dynamic process shaped by psychological, cultural, and social factors. Friendships play a crucial role in emotional well-being, social development, and personal identity from childhood to adulthood.Childhood and Early FriendshipsFriendships in childhood often arise due to shared environments, such as school or neighborhood interactions. At this stage, proximity and common interests serve as the primary basis for connection. As children grow, their friendships evolve...
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mindful Parenting Intervention MinUTo App for Parents of Preschool Children: Study Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Trial.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2022
Same author

The economic impact of lockdowns: A theoretical assessment.

Journal of mathematical economics·2021
Same author

Solar geoengineering may lead to excessive cooling and high strategic uncertainty.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2020
Same author

Group size in social-ecological systems.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2018
Same author

Pro-sociality and strategic reasoning in economic decisions.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2015
Same author

Weak reciprocity alone cannot explain peer punishment.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Money and trust among strangers.

Gabriele Camera1, Marco Casari, Maria Bigoni

  • 1Economic Science Institute, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|August 28, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Money is behaviorally essential for societal cooperation. Introducing tokens as money stabilized cooperation in large groups by fostering trust among strangers, overcoming trust deficits that hinder group functioning.

Keywords:
fiat moneymatching modelsrepeated games

More Related Videos

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Sociology
  • Evolutionary Game Theory

Background:

  • Modern society relies on cooperation among strangers.
  • Trust is crucial for sustained cooperation, but erodes in larger groups.
  • Standard economic theories do not fully capture the behavioral underpinnings of cooperation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the behavioral necessity of money in facilitating cooperation.
  • To examine how group size impacts cooperation without and with a medium of exchange.
  • To develop an evolutionary model explaining the role of money in heterogeneous societies.

Main Methods:

  • An experiment involving repeated interactions where subjects could help anonymous, changing counterparts.
  • Introduction of intrinsically worthless tokens that endogenously became a medium of exchange (money).
  • Analysis of cooperation levels across different group sizes and conditions (with and without tokens).
  • Development of an evolutionary model to explain the observed behavioral dynamics.

Main Results:

  • Cooperation declined significantly as group size increased in the absence of tokens.
  • The introduction of tokens as money stabilized cooperation, maintaining high levels regardless of group size.
  • Decentralized enforcement of social norms for cooperation was possible but demanding, especially in large groups.
  • Heterogeneous behavior led to cooperation collapse without tokens, but tokens promoted evolutionarily stable cooperation.

Conclusions:

  • Lack of trust among strangers makes money behaviorally essential for societal functioning.
  • Money facilitates cooperation by acting as a trust-enforcing mechanism in large, anonymous groups.
  • The use of tokens (money) is evolutionarily advantageous in societies with heterogeneous behaviors.