Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Improving children's obesity-related health care quality: process outcomes of a cluster-randomized controlled trial
Elsie M Taveras1, Richard Marshall, Christine M Horan
1Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Obesity Prevention Program, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Insights
Electronic decision support for pediatricians, combined with parent outreach, significantly improved healthcare quality for obese children. This dual approach enhanced BMI documentation and counseling rates compared to usual care.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health
- Clinical Informatics
- Public Health Interventions
Background:
- Childhood obesity is a significant public health concern requiring effective clinical interventions.
- Healthcare quality measures for pediatric obesity management are crucial for improving patient outcomes.
- Existing interventions often lack integrated approaches for clinicians and parents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate an intervention combining electronic decision support for pediatricians with direct-to-parent outreach.
- To assess the impact on healthcare quality measures for managing obese children (aged 6-12 years).
- To compare a dual intervention against point-of-care decision support alone and usual care.
Main Methods:
- A cluster-randomized trial involving 14 pediatric practices and 549 obese children (BMI ≥ 95th percentile).
- Three arms: Intervention-1 (pediatrician decision support), Intervention-2 (decision support + parent outreach), and usual care.
- Key outcomes: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures for BMI percentile documentation and counseling for nutrition/physical activity.
Main Results:
- Intervention-2 significantly increased the odds of BMI percentile documentation (adjusted OR: 3.97).
- Intervention-2 showed a higher prevalence of counseling for nutrition or physical activity (20.3%) compared to usual care (0.0%).
- Intervention-1 did not yield significant improvements in these HEDIS measures compared to usual care.
Conclusions:
- A combined intervention of clinician decision support and parent outreach effectively improved healthcare quality for pediatric obesity.
- Direct-to-parent communication alongside clinical decision support is key to enhancing obesity care quality.
- This integrated approach offers a promising strategy for managing childhood obesity in primary care settings.
Objective:
To examine the extent to which an intervention using electronic decision support delivered to pediatricians at the point-of-care of obese children, with or without direct-to-parent outreach, improved health care quality measures for child obesity.
Design And Methods:
Process outcomes from a three-arm, cluster-randomized trial from 14 pediatric practices in Massachusetts were reported. Participants were 549 children aged 6-12 years with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 95th percentile. In five practices (Intervention-1), pediatricians receive electronic decision support at the point-of-care. In five other practices (Intervention-2), pediatricians receive point-of-care decision support and parents receive information about their child's prior BMI before their scheduled visit. Four practices receive usual care. The main outcomes were Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance measures for child obesity: documentation of BMI percentile and use of counseling codes for nutrition or physical activity.
Results:
Compared to the usual care condition, participants in Intervention-2, but not Intervention-1, had substantially higher odds of use of HEDIS codes for BMI percentile documentation (adjusted OR: 3.97; 95% CI: 1.92, 8.23) and higher prevalence of use of HEDIS codes for counseling for nutrition or physical activity (adjusted predicted prevalence 20.3% [95% CI 8.5, 41.2] for Intervention -2 vs. 0.0% [0.0, 2.0] for usual care).
Conclusion:
An intervention that included both decision support for clinicians and outreach to parents resulted in improved health care quality measures for child obesity.
Related Concept Videos
Obesity
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
