Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developmental differences in visual processing: strategy versus structure.

E M Ruskin1, D B Kaye

  • 1University of California, Los Angeles.

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
|August 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Histopathology of birdshot retinochoroidopathy.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2002
Same author

Atraumatic transfer of the donor corneal button.

Cornea·1997
Same author

Attention to people and toys during social and object mastery in children with Down syndrome.

American journal of mental retardation : AJMR·1994
Same author

Object mastery motivation of children with Down syndrome.

American journal of mental retardation : AJMR·1994
Same author

A disposable contact lens program: a preliminary report.

The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc·1988
Same author

Levels and speed of processing effects on word analysis.

Memory & cognition·1985
Same journal

Executive function and preschoolers' responses to severe transgressions: implications for early forgiveness.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Shared cognitive risk factors underlying rapid automatized naming deficits for the comorbidity of developmental dyslexia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A computational parameter estimation via Bundesen's theory of visual attention.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Do young children understand the objectivity of reality?

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Learning words by ear or by eye: effects of modality on lexical configuration and lexicalization.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Thinking outside the Box: Causal uncertainty motivates children's over-imitation.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Effects of parental intervention on children's English utterances and behavioral responses in video-based second language learning.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
See all related articles

Young children classify objects by similarity, while adults use dimensional structure. This study suggests less efficient visual processing in children influences their classification strategy, supporting a stimulus-driven processing mode.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Adults classify objects by dimensional structure, while young children use similarity relations.
  • Two contrasting explanations for this developmental difference exist.
  • The role of stimulus structure in processing mode is also debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine explanations for age-related differences in object classification.
  • To investigate the influence of stimulus properties on visual processing modes.
  • To test whether children's classification is based on holistic structure or processing efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Three age groups (children and adults) participated.
  • Tasks included feature search, conjunction search, and restricted classification.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli varied in dimensional structure: highly separable, integral, and intermediate.

    • Main Results:

    • Evidence contradicts the idea that children use a primitive holistic structure.
    • Younger subjects' less efficient visual processing may drive similarity-based classification.
    • Processing mode appears to be stimulus-driven, supporting Garner's theory.

    Conclusions:

    • Children's object classification is not based on a more primitive holistic structure.
    • Developmental differences in classification strategies are linked to visual processing efficiency.
    • Object processing modes are significantly influenced by stimulus characteristics.