Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Cervical dilatation and curettage in elective caesarean section. A retrospective analysis
Sebastian Berlit1, Jana Nickol, Christel Weiss
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Routine cervical dilatation and/or curettage during elective Caesarean section (CS) do not improve maternal outcomes. These procedures prolong operating time without reducing postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) or other complications.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Surgical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Intraoperative cervical dilatation and curettage are sometimes performed during elective Caesarean sections (CS).
- The impact of these procedures on maternal morbidity, specifically postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), requires thorough investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the influence of intraoperative cervical dilatation and curettage during elective Caesarean section (CS) on maternal morbidity.
- To identify risk factors associated with postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in patients undergoing elective CS.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of 1,003 elective Caesarean sections (CS).
- Primary outcome measure: influence of cervical dilatation and curettage on postpartum haemorrhage (PPH).
- Subgroup analyses and multiple logistic regression were used to identify PPH risk factors.
Main Results:
- Multiple pregnancy and high body mass index were identified as significant risk factors for PPH.
- Cervical dilatation and curettage were not statistically significant in reducing PPH.
- Uterine sub-involution was more frequent when the cervix was dilated (p=0.0482).
- Operating time significantly increased with cervical dilatation and/or curettage (p<0.0001).
Conclusions:
- Routine cervical dilatation and/or curettage are not beneficial in elective Caesarean sections (CS).
- Performing these procedures prolongs operating time without improving postoperative outcomes.
- The findings suggest these interventions should not be routinely employed in elective CS procedures.
More Related Videos
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures (IRCP): A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
05:21Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri
Published on: September 12, 2025