Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Manual vs mechanical thrombectomy during PCI for STEMI: a comprehensive direct and adjusted indirect meta-analysis of
Eliano Pio Navarese1, Giuseppe Tarantini, Giuseppe Musumeci
1Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Insights
Mechanical thrombectomy may offer benefits over manual thrombectomy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with high thrombus burden. This meta-analysis compared manual and mechanical thrombectomy devices in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Manual thrombectomy improves coronary flow post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- Mechanical thrombectomy devices are gaining interest for potentially larger thrombus removal compared to manual methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct the first direct and adjusted indirect meta-analysis comparing manual and mechanical thrombectomy in PCI for STEMI.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mechanical versus manual thrombectomy strategies.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies comparing manual thrombectomy, mechanical thrombectomy, or placebo.
- Searches covered electronic databases from November 1994 to June 2013, selecting clinical and procedural endpoints.
- Included 3 direct comparison studies (2 RCTs, 1 non-randomized; N=513) and 21 RCTs (N=4514) for indirect comparison.
Main Results:
- Direct meta-analysis showed comparable survival, re-infarction (MI), and procedural outcomes, but was limited by patient numbers.
- Indirect meta-analysis indicated superior mortality reduction with manual thrombectomy overall (p=0.01).
- Excluding trials with low baseline thrombus burden (<50%), mechanical thrombectomy showed comparable survival but reduced re-MI (p<0.001) and stroke (p=0.04).
Conclusions:
- Mechanical thrombectomy is supported in STEMI patients with high thrombus burden.
- In high thrombus burden populations, mechanical thrombectomy may offer greater benefits than manual thrombectomy.
- Further research with larger patient cohorts is warranted to confirm findings.
Unlabelled:
Thrombus removal by manual thrombectomy improves coronary flow and myocardial perfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); growing interest is on mechanical devices for thrombectomy which may allow a larger thrombus removal as compared to manual devices. We aimed to perform the first direct and adjusted indirect meta-analysis of studies on manual and mechanical thrombectomy in PCI for STEMI.
Methods:
The literature was scanned for direct and indirect randomized comparisons between manual and/or mechanical thrombectomy and/or placebo by formal searches of electronic databases from November 1994 to June 2013. Clinical and procedural endpoints were selected.
Results:
Three studies directly comparing (2 RCTs and 1 non-randomized; N = 513) and 21 RCTs (N = 4514) indirectly comparing the two strategies were included in the meta-analysis. The direct meta-analysis showed comparable rates of survival (p = 0.88), re-infarction (MI) (p = 0.84) and procedural outcomes between the two strategies; direct evidence was however limited in number of enrolled patients. The indirect meta-analysis showed a superior reduction in mortality with manual thrombectomy compared to mechanical thrombectomy in the overall analysis (p = 0.01); by excluding trials with low percentage of patients with intracoronary thrombus (< 50%) at baseline, the two strategies were comparable in survival, but mechanical thrombectomy was associated with a significant reduction in re-MI (p < 0.001) and stroke (p = 0.04).
Conclusions:
This meta-analysis lends support to mechanical thrombectomy in the population with high thrombus burden only where, compared to manual thrombectomy, it is likely to provide higher benefits.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

