Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
The roles of explanation and feedback in false belief understanding: a microgenetic analysis
Nicole R Guajardo1, Rachel Petersen, Timothy R Marshall
1Christopher Newport University, Department of Psychology, Newport News, VA 23606, USA. nguajard@cnu.edu
Abstract:
The authors examined effects of feedback and explanation on false belief performance. Thirty-three children (42-54 months; 15 girls, 18 boys) were randomly assigned to four treatment conditions: explanation, feedback, feedback researcher explains, and feedback child explains. Children completed false belief tasks during pretraining, 8 training sessions, and posttraining across 6 weeks. Language comprehension was assessed at pretraining. The authors hypothesized that children would improve most when training involved feedback and explanation. Generalized estimating equations modeling was used to analyze the data. Children who received feedback and generated explanations for characters' false beliefs improved across training sessions more so than children in other conditions. Children's explanations for false beliefs also were explored. Implications of the findings are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Understanding Deception
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Fundamental Attribution Error
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Confirmation Biases

