Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens
10:38

DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens

Published on: February 1, 2020

Diagnostic evaluation of solid pancreatic masses.

Jeffrey L Tokar1, Rohit Walia

  • 1Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Jeffrey.Tokar@fccc.edu

Current Gastroenterology Reports
|September 3, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care01:29

Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care

The management of chronic pancreatitis is multifaceted, involving a comprehensive approach that includes thorough assessment, diagnostic testing, and a variety of management strategies.
Assessment:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Excess of high-caffeinated energy drinks causing ventricular arrhythmias.

Journal of family medicine and primary care·2024
Same author

Electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and raised interleukin-6.

Journal of family medicine and primary care·2023
Same author

COVID myocardial involvement presenting as left ventricular aneurysm and clot associated with normal coronary anatomy, deep vein thrombosis, and abnormal brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation.

Journal of family medicine and primary care·2022
Same author

Electrocardiographic Abnormalities predicting mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia patients.

Journal of family medicine and primary care·2022
Same author

Takayasu arteritis coexisting with scalp necrosis, alopecia, and sterile osteomyelitis.

Journal of family medicine and primary care·2022
Same author

Point of care ultrasound as initial diagnostic tool in acute dyspnea patients in the emergency department of a tertiary care center: diagnostic accuracy study.

International journal of emergency medicine·2022
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Accurately diagnosing solid pancreatic masses is crucial for treatment. Advanced imaging like CT, MRI, and endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration can determine if a pancreatic mass is benign or malignant.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Radiology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Accurate diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions is essential for effective patient management.
  • Technological advancements have significantly improved pancreatic imaging resolution.
  • Differentiating benign from malignant pancreatic masses guides treatment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the diagnostic capabilities of modern imaging modalities for solid pancreatic masses.
  • To highlight the role of cross-sectional and endoscopic imaging in evaluating pancreatic lesions.
  • To emphasize the importance of understanding imaging strengths and limitations for patient evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current cross-sectional imaging techniques, including computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens
10:38

DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens

Published on: February 1, 2020

  • Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) as a diagnostic tool.
  • Discussion of the comparative strengths and limitations of each modality.

    • Main Results:

    • Computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) are effective in determining the nature of most solid pancreatic masses.
    • These advanced imaging techniques offer high resolution for detailed pancreatic visualization.
    • Knowledge of modality-specific capabilities aids in optimal patient workup.

    Conclusions:

    • Modern imaging modalities are pivotal in diagnosing solid pancreatic masses.
    • CT, MRI, and EUS-FNA provide crucial information for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.
    • A comprehensive understanding of these imaging tools is vital for the evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses.