Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age01:27

Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age

Age-related pharmacokinetic changes are extensively documented, but understanding age-related pharmacodynamic alterations is relatively limited. This knowledge gap can be partly attributed to the complexity of developing appropriate measures of drug responses compared to bioanalytical methods for determining drug concentrations.Most information regarding age-related differences in human pharmacodynamics originates from cross-sectional studies. However, these studies assume that observed mean...
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring01:24

Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
Data Collection III01:05

Data Collection III

The physical assessment examines the patient for objective data that defines the patient's condition, and aids in formulating the nursing care plan. The purpose of physical assessment is a health status appraisal, which includes identifying health problems, and establishing a database for nursing intervention.
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the patient.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characteristics of fall recurrence among persistent, quasi-persistent, and transient fallers: a 3-year analysis from the SCOPE study.

European geriatric medicine·2026
Same author

The Biological and Psychological Profiles of Hospital Healthcare Professionals During a Stressful Wartime.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

Age-Related Associations between Reactive-Balance Stepping Responses, Self-Induced Stepping, and Gray-Matter Volume.

Gerontology·2026
Same author

Who benefits from multidisciplinary care in functional somatic disorders? Identifying cost-effective patient selection through diagnostic classification groups.

Israel journal of health policy research·2026
Same author

Feasibility, satisfaction, and preliminary results of a coping skills training program for parents of children with cancer.

Journal of pediatric psychology·2026
Same author

Speed of Voluntary Step Execution May Predict Survival among Older Adults: An Explorative Study.

Gerontology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
06:52

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit

Published on: September 30, 2020

Differences between self-reported and observed physical functioning in independent older adults.

Rona Feuering1, Elisha Vered, Talma Kushnir

  • 1Department of Physical Therapy and.

Disability and Rehabilitation
|September 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Older adults and clinicians show agreement on lower extremity function, but not upper extremity function. This systematic bias, especially in upper limb assessments, requires awareness in clinical practice.

Keywords:
Elderlyfear of fallobserved physical functionself-reported function

More Related Videos

Exergaming in Older People Living with HIV Improves Balance, Mobility and Ameliorates Some Aspects of Frailty
07:27

Exergaming in Older People Living with HIV Improves Balance, Mobility and Ameliorates Some Aspects of Frailty

Published on: October 6, 2016

Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly
08:25

Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly

Published on: March 11, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
06:52

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit

Published on: September 30, 2020

Exergaming in Older People Living with HIV Improves Balance, Mobility and Ameliorates Some Aspects of Frailty
07:27

Exergaming in Older People Living with HIV Improves Balance, Mobility and Ameliorates Some Aspects of Frailty

Published on: October 6, 2016

Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly
08:25

Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly

Published on: March 11, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Geriatric medicine
  • Rehabilitation science
  • Outcome assessment

Background:

  • Assessing functional status in older adults is crucial for developing effective outcome measures.
  • Understanding agreement between patient self-reports and clinician assessments is a key step.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the agreement between self-reported and clinician-assessed physical function in older adults.
  • To compare agreement for lower versus upper extremity tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Fifty community-dwelling older adults (70-91 years) underwent separate, blinded assessments.
  • The Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) was used for self-reported and observed lower/upper extremity tasks.
  • Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 'mountain plots' analyzed agreement; associations with Fear of Fall Scale (FES) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were explored.

Main Results:

  • High agreement (ICC=0.83) for lower extremity function, but poorer agreement (ICC=0.31) for upper extremity function.
  • Mountain plots indicated systematic overestimation of function by older adults, particularly for upper extremity tasks.
  • Self-reported function showed stronger associations with FES and GDS than observed function.

Conclusions:

  • A significant systematic bias exists between self-reported and clinician-assessed physical function in older adults.
  • This bias is more pronounced for upper extremity function compared to lower extremity function.
  • Clinicians must recognize potential discrepancies, especially in upper limb assessments, for accurate patient evaluation.