Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Assessment of Global DNA Double-Strand End Resection using BrdU-DNA Labeling coupled with Cell Cycle Discrimination Imaging
Published on: April 28, 2021
Push back to respond better: regulatory inhibition of the DNA double-strand break response
Stephanie Panier1, Daniel Durocher
11] The Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada. [2] Present address: DNA Damage Response Laboratory, London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK, Clare Hall, South Mimms, London EN6 3LD, UK.
Abstract:
Single DNA lesions such as DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can cause cell death or trigger genome rearrangements that have oncogenic potential, and so the pathways that mend and signal DNA damage must be highly sensitive but, at the same time, selective and reversible. When initiated, boundaries must be set to restrict the DSB response to the site of the lesion. The integration of positive and, crucially, negative control points involving post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and acetylation is key for building fast, effective responses to DNA damage and for mitigating the impact of DNA lesions on genome integrity.
Insights
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger cell death and cancer. Pathways controlling DNA damage response must be sensitive, selective, and reversible, using post-translational modifications to maintain genome integrity.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Cell Biology
Background:
- DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are critical DNA lesions.
- Unrepaired DSBs can lead to cell death or oncogenic genome rearrangements.
- Effective DNA damage response pathways are essential for maintaining genome integrity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the regulatory mechanisms of DNA damage response pathways.
- To understand how sensitivity, selectivity, and reversibility are achieved in DNA repair.
- To highlight the role of post-translational modifications in controlling DNA damage signaling.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on DNA damage response pathways.
- Analysis of signaling networks involving phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, and acetylation.
- Examination of regulatory checkpoints in DNA repair.
Main Results:
- DNA damage response pathways require precise control to prevent deleterious effects.
- Positive and negative regulatory mechanisms, including post-translational modifications, are crucial.
- Establishing boundaries for the response is key to limiting damage signaling.
Conclusions:
- A balance of sensitivity and selectivity is achieved through complex regulatory networks.
- Post-translational modifications are central to the dynamic control of DNA repair.
- Effective management of DNA lesions is vital for preventing genomic instability and cancer.
Related Concept Videos
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
Negative Regulator Molecules

