Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Retinal Pigment Epithelium Transplantation in a Non-human Primate Model for Degenerative Retinal Diseases
Published on: June 14, 2021
D-Penicillamine for preventing retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants
Mosarrat J Qureshi1, Manoj Kumar
1Pediatrics, Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5H 3V9.
Insights
Prophylactic D-penicillamine does not prevent retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in preterm infants. This study found no significant reduction in ROP, death, or neurodevelopmental delay, advising against its use for ROP prevention.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Ophthalmology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) rates have decreased in premature infants due to improved neonatal intensive care.
- An unexpected low ROP rate was observed in infants treated with D-penicillamine for hyperbilirubinemia, prompting investigation for ROP prevention.
- This study explored the use of D-penicillamine, administered enterally and intravenously, to prevent ROP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prophylactic effect of D-penicillamine on the incidence of acute or severe ROP in preterm infants.
- To assess the impact of D-penicillamine on other morbidities in preterm infants.
- To determine if D-penicillamine administration influences neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted using the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group search strategy.
- Searches included multiple electronic databases, previous reviews, and expert informants, updated through November 27, 2012.
- Three randomized trials comparing D-penicillamine with placebo or no treatment in preterm infants were included and analyzed for ROP outcomes.
Main Results:
- Meta-analysis of three trials revealed no significant difference in the risk of any stage ROP (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.03-3.70) or severe ROP (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.03-4.26).
- No significant differences were observed in the risk of death (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.68-1.32) between treatment and control groups.
- Subgroup analysis of infants under 1500g birth weight yielded similar results, with no reported side effects or significant differences in spasticity or developmental delay at one-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Prophylactic D-penicillamine administration in preterm infants does not effectively prevent acute or severe ROP.
- The drug did not show a significant impact on reducing mortality or preventing neurodevelopmental delay in the studied population.
- Based on current evidence, D-penicillamine is not recommended for the prevention of retinopathy of prematurity.
Background:
The rate of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in moderately premature infants has decreased dramatically with improved care in the neonatal intensive care unit. A low rate of this disorder was unexpectedly observed among infants treated with intravenous D-penicillamine to prevent hyperbilirubinaemia. This observation led to the investigation of its use, both enterally as well as intravenously, to prevent ROP.
Objectives:
To determine the effect of prophylactic administration of D-penicillamine on the incidence of acute ROP or severe ROP and other morbidities in preterm infants.
Search Methods:
We used the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group search strategy. Two review authors independently searched multiple electronic databases, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference/symposia proceedings, and expert informants. We updated the search on November 27, 2012.
Selection Criteria:
We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials if they administered D-penicillamine and compared it with no treatment or placebo to premature infants and reported on the outcome of ROP.
Data Collection And Analysis:
We used the criteria and standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to assess the methodological quality of the included trials. One review author examined trials for validity. A second review author checked validity and they reached consensus on the final data before entry into this review. We used the standards of the Neonatal Cochrane Review Group to analyse data.
Main Results:
Three randomised trials met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed no significant differences in the risk of any stage ROP (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03 to 3.70), severe ROP (typical RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.03 to 4.26) or death (typical RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.32) in all treated infants. When the subgroup of infants under 1500 g birth weight was examined, the results were similar. No side effects were reported, and follow-up at one year revealed no significant differences in spasticity or developmental delay.
Authors' Conclusions:
Administration of prophylactic D-penicillamine in preterm infants does not prevent acute or severe ROP, death or neurodevelopmental delay. D-penicillamine cannot be recommended for the prevention of ROP based on the available evidence.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetic Retinopathy
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
