A comparative study of methods to compute the free energy of an ordered assembly by molecular simulation

We present a comparative study of methods to compute the absolute free energy of a crystalline assembly of hard particles by molecular simulation. We consider all combinations of three choices defining the methodology: (1) the reference system: Einstein crystal (EC), interacting harmonic (IH), or r(-12) soft spheres (SS); (2) the integration path: Frenkel-Ladd (FL) or penetrable ramp (PR); and (3) the free-energy method: overlap-sampling free-energy perturbation (OS) or thermodynamic integration (TI). We apply the methods to FCC hard spheres at the melting state. The study shows that, in the best cases, OS and TI are roughly equivalent in efficiency, with a slight advantage to TI. We also examine the multistate Bennett acceptance ratio method, and find that it offers no advantage for this particular application. The PR path shows advantage in general over FL, providing results of the same precision with 2-9 times less computation, depending on the choice of a common reference. The best combination for the FL path is TI+EC, which is how the FL method is usually implemented. For the PR path, the SS system (with either TI or OS) proves to be most effective; it gives equivalent precision to TI+FL+EC with about 6 times less computation (or 12 times less, if discounting the computational effort required to establish the SS reference free energy). Both the SS and IH references show great advantage in capturing finite-size effects, providing a variation in free-energy difference with system size that is about 10 times less than EC. This result further confirms previous work for soft-particle crystals, and suggests that free-energy calculations for a structured assembly be performed using a hybrid method, in which the finite-system free-energy difference is added to the extrapolated (1/N→0) absolute free energy of the reference system, to obtain a result that is nearly independent of system size.