A phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve

K Kruczek1, M Ratterman, K Tolzien

  • 1Department of Medicine, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA.

British Journal of Cancer
|September 7, 2013
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Temsirolimus showed minimal efficacy in treating castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients who had not received prior chemotherapy. While some patients experienced stable disease, the overall response rate was low, suggesting limited clinical benefit.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is frequently dysregulated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
  • Investigating novel therapeutic targets is crucial for improving outcomes in CRPC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in patients with chemotherapy-naïve CRPC.
  • To assess the overall response rate and clinical benefit of temsirolimus monotherapy.

Main Methods:

  • A phase II, open-label study involving 21 patients with chemotherapy-naïve CRPC.
  • Patients received intravenous temsirolimus at 25 mg weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
  • Efficacy was assessed by objective response (OR), stable disease (SD), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes, and time to progression.

Main Results:

  • Fifteen patients were evaluable for efficacy; 2 (13%) had a partial response, and 8 (53%) had stable disease, yielding an overall clinical benefit (OR+SD) of 67%.
  • Median time to radiographic disease progression was 2 months; 7% of patients achieved >50% PSA decline.
  • Median overall survival was 13 months, with common toxicities including fatigue, pneumonia, hyperglycemia, and hypophosphatemia.

Conclusions:

  • Temsirolimus monotherapy demonstrated minimal activity in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC.
  • The observed toxicities were consistent with known adverse events of temsirolimus, and quality of life was not adversely impacted.