Development of a novel composite stroke and bleeding risk score in patients with atrial fibrillation: the AMADEUS

Gregory Y H Lip1, Deirdre A Lane1, Harry Buller2

  • 1University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, England.

Chest
|September 7, 2013
PubMed

Insights

New composite scores predict stroke and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. While validated, they showed no significant improvement over existing risk scores for practical clinical use.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Risk Stratification
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) management requires balancing stroke/thromboembolism and major bleeding risks.
  • Existing risk factors for stroke and bleeding overlap, suggesting a need for composite risk scores.
  • Identifying independent predictors is crucial for refining patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify independent predictors of overall clinical outcomes in AF patients.
  • To develop and validate novel composite risk-stratification scores for stroke/thromboembolism and/or major bleeding.
  • To compare the performance of new scores against established risk models.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) arm of the AMADEUS trial (n=2,293).
  • Definition of two composite endpoints: (1) stroke/thromboembolism or major bleeding; (2) stroke, embolism, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or major bleeding.
  • External validation of developed scores in a real-world cohort (n=441).

Main Results:

  • Independent predictors for composite endpoint 1 included age, prior stroke/TIA, aspirin use, and time in therapeutic range.
  • Left ventricular dysfunction was an additional predictor for composite endpoint 2.
  • Novel composite scores showed numerically higher discriminatory performance (AUCs 0.728 and 0.707) but not statistically significant improvement over CHADS2, CHA2DS2VASc, and HAS-BLED scores.

Conclusions:

  • Two novel composite risk scores for stroke/thromboembolism/bleeding in AF patients were developed and validated.
  • These scores demonstrated good discriminatory and predictive performance.
  • The novel scores did not outperform traditional, more practical risk scores currently in use.
Abstract