Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Development of a novel composite stroke and bleeding risk score in patients with atrial fibrillation: the AMADEUS
Gregory Y H Lip1, Deirdre A Lane1, Harry Buller2
1University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, England.
Insights
New composite scores predict stroke and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. While validated, they showed no significant improvement over existing risk scores for practical clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Risk Stratification
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) management requires balancing stroke/thromboembolism and major bleeding risks.
- Existing risk factors for stroke and bleeding overlap, suggesting a need for composite risk scores.
- Identifying independent predictors is crucial for refining patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify independent predictors of overall clinical outcomes in AF patients.
- To develop and validate novel composite risk-stratification scores for stroke/thromboembolism and/or major bleeding.
- To compare the performance of new scores against established risk models.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) arm of the AMADEUS trial (n=2,293).
- Definition of two composite endpoints: (1) stroke/thromboembolism or major bleeding; (2) stroke, embolism, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or major bleeding.
- External validation of developed scores in a real-world cohort (n=441).
Main Results:
- Independent predictors for composite endpoint 1 included age, prior stroke/TIA, aspirin use, and time in therapeutic range.
- Left ventricular dysfunction was an additional predictor for composite endpoint 2.
- Novel composite scores showed numerically higher discriminatory performance (AUCs 0.728 and 0.707) but not statistically significant improvement over CHADS2, CHA2DS2VASc, and HAS-BLED scores.
Conclusions:
- Two novel composite risk scores for stroke/thromboembolism/bleeding in AF patients were developed and validated.
- These scores demonstrated good discriminatory and predictive performance.
- The novel scores did not outperform traditional, more practical risk scores currently in use.
Background:
The aim of the current analysis was to identify independent predictors of the overall clinical outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including both stroke/thromboembolism and/or major bleeding. Given the overlap between stroke and bleeding risk factors, a composite risk-stratification score for stroke/thromboembolism or bleeding could potentially be developed.
Methods:
We used data from the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) arm (n = 2,293; 65% men; mean age 70 ± 9 years) of the AMADEUS (Evaluating the Use of SR34006 Compared to Warfarin or Acenocoumarol in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial, which was a multicenter, randomized, open-label noninferiority study that compared fixed-dose idraparinux with VKA in patients with AF. We defined two composite end points: end point 1 was the combination of stroke/thromboembolism or major bleeding; end point 2 was defined as the combination of stroke, systemic or venous embolism, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or major bleeding.
Results:
The independent predictors for composite end point 1 were age (P = .014), previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (P = .049), aspirin use (P = .002), and time in therapeutic range (P = .007). For composite end point 2, similar predictors were evident, plus left ventricular dysfunction (P = .011). Based on the regression models, two novel composite risk-prediction scores were developed and were validated externally in a "real-world" cohort of 441 outpatients with AF receiving anticoagulation treatment. Both composite scores 1 and 2 demonstrated numerically higher discriminatory performance (area under the curve [AUC], 0.728; 95% CI, 0.659-0.798 and AUC, 0.707; 95% CI, 0.655-0.758, for end points 1 and 2, respectively) and a positive net reclassification when compared with currently used risk models (CHADS2 [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack], CHA2DS2VASc [cardiac failure or dysfunction, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years [doubled], diabetes, stroke (doubled)-vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and sex category (female)], and HAS-BLED [hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly]), but the differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusions:
We have developed and validated two novel composite scores for stroke/thromboembolism/bleeding that offer good discriminatory and predictive performance. However, these composite risk scores did not perform better than the easier and more practical "traditional" stroke and bleeding risk scores that are currently in use, which allow greater practicality and a more personalized balancing of risks.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
