Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Orthotopic Kidney Auto-Transplantation in a Porcine Model Using 24 Hours Organ Preservation And Continuous Telemetry
Published on: August 21, 2020
Optimizing recovery, utilization and transplantation outcomes for kidneys from small, ≤20 kg, pediatric donors
D G Maluf1, R J Carrico, J D Rosendale
1Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Abstract:
The optimal balance between maximizing the number versus the outcome of transplantation utilizing kidneys from small (≤20 kg) pediatric donors remains unclear, complicated by the choice of single versus en bloc transplantation with their attendant technical risks. Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database, we examined kidney recovery and utilization patterns, and 1-year transplant outcomes by single kilogram weight strata. Between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2010, 2352 kidneys from ≤20 kg donors were transplanted into 1531 recipients, 710 single kidney transplants (SKTs) and 821 en bloc kidney transplants (EBKTs). Increased donor weight was associated with higher rates of recovery, transplantation and SKT. Low donor weight (linear p < 0.001; quadratic p = 0.003), SKT versus EBKT (p = 0.008), increased cold ischemia time (p = 0.003), local versus nonlocal donor (p = 0.0044), low versus high volume center (p = 0.003) and the interaction term between center volume and donor weight (p = 0.0024) were associated with graft failure. Notably, lower donor weight exacerbated the negative impact of low center volume but did not worsen the negative impact of SKT on outcomes. Our data show that EBKT offers superior 1-year survival at the expense of accomplishing one rather than two transplants. However, SKTs yield excellent outcomes when performed at experienced centers.
Insights
Transplanting kidneys from small pediatric donors involves trade-offs. While en bloc kidney transplants offer better survival, single kidney transplants yield excellent outcomes at experienced centers.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Transplantation Surgery
- Pediatric Surgery
Background:
- Optimizing kidney transplantation from small pediatric donors (≤20 kg) presents challenges regarding donor number versus transplant outcome.
- The choice between single versus en bloc kidney transplantation strategies involves technical risks and impacts utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze kidney recovery, utilization, and 1-year transplant outcomes from small pediatric donors (≤20 kg).
- To compare outcomes of single versus en bloc kidney transplantation in recipients of pediatric donor kidneys.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database for data from January 1, 2005, to June 30, 2010.
- Examined 2352 kidneys from pediatric donors (≤20 kg) transplanted into 1531 recipients, categorizing into single kidney transplants (SKTs) and en bloc kidney transplants (EBKTs).
- Analyzed factors associated with graft failure, including donor weight, transplant type, cold ischemia time, donor origin, and transplant center volume.
Main Results:
- Increased donor weight correlated with higher recovery, transplantation, and SKT rates.
- Graft failure was associated with lower donor weight, SKT (vs. EBKT), longer cold ischemia time, nonlocal donors, and lower volume centers.
- Lower donor weight amplified the negative impact of low center volume but not SKT on outcomes.
Conclusions:
- En bloc kidney transplantation (EBKT) provides superior 1-year graft survival but results in fewer transplants compared to single kidney transplantation (SKT).
- SKTs achieve excellent outcomes when performed at high-volume, experienced transplant centers.
- Strategic selection of transplant approach based on donor characteristics and center expertise is crucial for optimizing pediatric kidney transplantation.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care

