Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

Blinding

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

Blind Procedures

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Real-World Effectiveness of the Peer-Led Honest, Open, Proud Programme for Self-Stigma Among Adults With Mental Illness: A Pragmatic, Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2026

Same author

Stigma is on the rise.

World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)·2026

Same author

Implementing a peer navigation program for individuals with serious mental illness in the criminal legal system: insights and lessons learned.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2026

Same author

How Personal Attitudes About Legalizing Cannabis and Corresponding State Laws Affect the Stigma of Cannabis Use.

Journal of psychoactive drugs·2025

Same author

Implementation of Community Participation Practices in Coordinated Specialty Care: Insights from a Qualitative Study.

Community mental health journal·2025

Same author

Education and Navigation Programs to Promote Food and Nutrition Security Among People With Serious Mental Illness.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2025

Same journal

Terms of whose reference? Commissioning, power, and the distribution of evaluative learning in development.

Evaluation and program planning·2026

Same journal

Proposing an identity-in-context framework for culturally responsive evaluation.

Evaluation and program planning·2026

Same journal

The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned.

Evaluation and program planning·2026

Same journal

Decolonizing evaluation education in South Africa: A reflective case study of master's curriculum reform through a Made-in-Africa evaluation lens.

Evaluation and program planning·2026

Same journal

Program evaluation plan assessing African American male achievement at predominantly white institutions: New Jersey education opportunity fund.

Evaluation and program planning·2026

Same journal

Cardiovascular screening in homeless outreach: An operationally-ethical protocol.

Evaluation and program planning·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validity.

Patrick W Corrigan¹, Mark S Salzer

¹Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, University of Chicago, 7230 Arbor Drive, Tinley Park, IL 60477, USA.

Evaluation and Program Planning

|September 10, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Randomized clinical trials are powerful but can be flawed. Considering participant treatment preference is crucial for improving research validity and engagement in clinical studies.

More Related Videos

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Clinical research methodology
Psychological research

Background:

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for clinical outcome studies due to their ability to minimize threats to internal validity.
However, RCTs often overlook the impact of participant treatment preference on study outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight how participant treatment preference can introduce unanticipated threats to the internal validity of randomized clinical trials.
To review strategies that enhance randomization while accommodating treatment preferences.

Main Methods:

The paper discusses the influence of treatment preference on participant behavior during the recruitment, engagement, and attrition phases of clinical trials.
It reviews existing research strategies that augment randomization by incorporating treatment preference.

Main Results:

Participant treatment preference significantly affects recruitment, engagement with interventions, and study attrition rates.
Failure to account for preference can compromise the internal validity of randomized studies.

Conclusions:

Integrating participant treatment preference into research designs is essential for enhancing the validity and reliability of clinical studies.
Strategies such as enhancing enrollment, pilot testing randomization assumptions, and employing partially randomized clinical trials can address these challenges.