Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Reducing confounding in natural experiments: evaluating a multilevel matching approach.

Journal of experimental criminology·2026

Same author

Opioid Message Fatigue in the United States: Prevalence and Associations with Stigma and Policy Support.

Substance use & misuse·2026

Same author

Shaping science: Scholarly motivation and research outcomes in NIH-HEAL funded studies.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Perspectives on collaboration between drug courts and MOUD providers: Impact of interagency implementation strategies.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2026

Same author

Implementation mechanisms used in national efforts to improve community services to keep individuals with mental illness out of local jails.

Implementation science communications·2025

Same author

Predictive Validity of the e-Connect Suicide Risk Classification Algorithm in Youth on Probation.

JAACAP open·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Improving process evaluations of correctional programs by using a comprehensive evaluation methodology.

Jeffrey A Bouffard¹, Faye S Taxman, Rebecca Silverman

¹Department of Sociology, North Dakota State University, 402 Minard Hall Suite 301, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.

Evaluation and Program Planning

|September 10, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a comprehensive evaluation methodology for therapeutic communities (TCs) treating drug-involved offenders. Combining multiple data collection methods provides a more accurate picture of program implementation in correctional settings.

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

Area of Science:

Criminal Justice
Public Health
Program Evaluation

Background:

Therapeutic communities (TCs) are crucial for addressing drug-involved offenders.
Accurate program implementation assessment is vital for effective correctional interventions.
Existing evaluation methods may not fully capture the nuances of TC programs.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and present a comprehensive methodology for evaluating TCs.
To highlight the necessity of combined evaluation techniques for accurate implementation data.
To compare data generated by diverse collection methods within correctional settings.

Main Methods:

Utilized a comprehensive evaluation methodology across seven TCs in jail and prison facilities.
Employed traditional stakeholder interviews (clinicians, officers, administrators).
Incorporated official program measures (drug tests, sanctions) and a novel structured observation technique for direct treatment activity capture.

Main Results:

Diverse data collection methods yield different types and qualities of information.
Structured observation effectively captures the nature of delivered treatment.
Combined methodologies offer a more accurate and detailed view of correctional program implementation.

Conclusions:

A comprehensive evaluation methodology is superior for assessing TC program implementation.
Integrating multiple data sources provides a richer understanding of program delivery.
This approach enhances the accuracy and detail of information on correctional program implementation.