Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Properdin deficiency or anti-properdin treatment ameliorates disease in the C3 gain-of-function mouse model of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

C3 Glomerulonephritis Associated With Anti-complement Factor B Antibodies Following Anti-cancer Treatment With Pembrolizumab.

Kidney medicine·2026
Same author

Complement biomarkers during iptacopan treatment - Authors' reply.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of eculizumab withdrawal in atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: the SETS aHUS multi-centre, open-label, prospective and single-arm study.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Eculizumab withdrawal and monitoring in atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (SETS aHUS): a multicentre, open label, prospective, single arm trial.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2026
Same author

Current and Emerging Therapies for C3 Glomerulopathy and Primary (Idiopathic) Immune Complex Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis.

Kidney international reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
11:15

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations

Published on: July 24, 2021

5.5K

David L. Rosenhan (1929-2012).

Lee Ross1, David Kavanagh

  • 1Stanford University.

The American Psychologist
|September 11, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

David L. Rosenhan, a pioneer in psychology and law, advanced the application of psychological methods to legal practices. His legacy includes contributions to expert witness examination, jury selection, and fostering human dignity in research.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models
10:19

Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models

Published on: August 9, 2012

19.9K
Silk Film Culture System for in vitro Analysis and Biomaterial Design
11:19

Silk Film Culture System for in vitro Analysis and Biomaterial Design

Published on: April 24, 2012

20.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
11:15

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations

Published on: July 24, 2021

5.5K
Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models
10:19

Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models

Published on: August 9, 2012

19.9K
Silk Film Culture System for in vitro Analysis and Biomaterial Design
11:19

Silk Film Culture System for in vitro Analysis and Biomaterial Design

Published on: April 24, 2012

20.0K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology and Law
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Psychological Methods in Legal Practice

Background:

  • David L. Rosenhan (1929-2012) was a distinguished professor emeritus at Stanford University.
  • He held degrees in mathematics, economics, and psychology from Yeshiva College and Columbia University.
  • Rosenhan pioneered the integration of psychological methods into legal contexts.

Discussion:

  • His work influenced expert witness examination, jury selection, and jury deliberation processes.
  • Rosenhan held leadership roles in the American Psychology-Law Society and the American Board of Forensic Psychology.
  • He was a fellow of prestigious scientific organizations including the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Key Insights:

  • Rosenhan's interdisciplinary approach bridged psychology and law, enhancing legal practice.
  • He emphasized human dignity and the confrontation of power abuse in his teaching and research.
  • His mentorship encouraged graduate students' creativity and independent research.

Outlook:

  • Rosenhan's contributions continue to inform the fields of psychology and law.
  • His emphasis on ethical considerations remains relevant in legal and psychological research.
  • The integration of psychological insights into legal frameworks is an ongoing development.