Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Tubal Cytology of the Fallopian Tube as a Promising Tool for Ovarian Cancer Early Detection
Published on: July 25, 2017
[Diagnostic approaches of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia]
Shu-li Yang1, Wei-min Kong, Yu-mei Wu
1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Objective:
To investigate diagnostic approaches of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN) for improving the diagnostic levels of CGIN.
Methods:
Clinical data of 106 cases with CGIN admitted in hospital from Jan.2008 to Dec. 2010 were analyzed retrospectively.All data from preoperative thin-prep cytologic test (TCT), cervical biopsies and postoperative pathological examination of the excised cervical tissues were reviewed.
Results:
Among 106 patients, 62 cases (58.5%, 62/106) were low grade CGIN (L-CGIN), 44 cases (41.5%, 44/106) were high grade CGIN (H-CGIN); 25 cases (23.6%, 25/106) were pure CGIN and 81 cases (76.4%, 81/106) were CGIN mixed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Fifteen cases (14.2%, 15/106) were found atypical glandular cell (AGC) by TCT. In the 15 cases, there were 4 cases (6.5%, 4/62) L-CGIN, and 11 cases (25.0%, 11/44) H-CGIN, there was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05); among 15 cases with AGC, 11 cases of them (44.0%, 11/25) were pure CGIN, 4 cases (4.9%, 4/81) mixed with CIN, in which there were significant difference (P < 0.01).Seven cases (25.0%, 7/28) were detected glandular lesions in 28 cases by endocervical curettage (ECC). Totally 23 cases (22.8%, 23/101) were detected CGIN by colposcopy-directed biopsy, 11 cases (19.0%, 11/58) were with L-CGIN, 12 cases (27.9%, 12/43) H-CGIN, there was no significant difference between them (P > 0.05).Among the 23 cases, 13 cases (52.0%, 13/25) were pure CGIN, 10 cases (12.3%, 10/81) CGIN mixed with CIN, which showed significant difference (P < 0.01). All 106 patients were treated, 101 cases treated with cervical conization and 5 cases performed hysterectomy; 23 cases were diagnosed CGIN preoperation, the ratio of preoperative diagnosis was 21.7% (23/106), 83 cases (80.3%, 83/106) diagnosed postoperatively.
Conclusions:
Routine diagnostic methods of CGIN were not satisfaction, most CGIN were diagnosed after cervical resection.Cervical conization may play a very important role in diagnosis of CGIN.The positivity of TCT in H-CGIN was higher than L-CGIN. There was no different in diagnosing different CGIN grades by colposcopy-directed biopsy. The ratio of preoperative diagnosis of pure CGIN was higher than those with CGIN mixed with CIN.
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Glandular Epithelium
Multicellular glands are formed during early development when epithelial budding...
Cellular Adaptation IV: Dysplasia and Metaplasia
