Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
Published on: July 27, 2022
Validation of activPAL defined sedentary time and breaks in sedentary time in 4- to 6-year-olds
Xanne Janssen1, Dylan P Cliff, John J Reilly
1Interdisciplinary Educational Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Insights
The activPAL device accurately classifies sitting in young children but overestimates sedentary behavior breaks. It shows fair accuracy for standing and walking, with some inaccuracies in posture and break detection.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Kinesiology
- Pediatric Health
Background:
- Accurate measurement of physical activity and sedentary behavior is crucial for understanding child health.
- Wearable sensors like activPAL are commonly used to assess physical activity in children, but their accuracy needs validation in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the classification accuracy of the activPAL device for sedentary behavior (SB) and posture in 4- to 6-year-old children.
- To assess the device's accuracy in measuring total time spent sedentary and the total number of breaks in SB.
Main Methods:
- Forty children aged 4-6 years participated in a laboratory protocol with direct observation of posture (sit/lie, stand, walk, other).
- Posture classification was performed using activPAL software, with accuracy evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and ROC-AUC.
- Paired sample t-tests compared activPAL data with direct observation for time spent in postures and SB breaks.
Main Results:
- The activPAL demonstrated good classification accuracy for sitting (ROC-AUC = 0.84) and fair accuracy for standing (0.76) and walking (0.73).
- Time spent sitting/lying and standing was overestimated by 5.9% and 14.8%, respectively; walking was underestimated by 10.0%.
- The total number of sedentary behavior breaks was significantly overestimated by the activPAL (55 ± 27 breaks; p < .01).
Conclusions:
- The activPAL shows good performance in classifying basic postures like sitting in young children.
- The device struggles with classifying less common postures (e.g., kneeling) and exhibits inaccuracies in quantifying time spent in different postures and sedentary breaks.
- While useful, the activPAL's limitations in accuracy for specific postures and sedentary behavior metrics should be considered when used with young children.
Abstract:
This study examined the classification accuracy of the activPAL, including total time spent sedentary and total number of breaks in sedentary behavior (SB) in 4- to 6-year-old children. Forty children aged 4-6 years (5.3 ± 1.0 years) completed a ~150-min laboratory protocol involving sedentary, light, and moderate- to vigorous-intensity activities. Posture was coded as sit/lie, stand, walk, or other using direct observation. Posture was classified using the activPAL software. Classification accuracy was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). Time spent in each posture and total number of breaks in SB were compared using paired sample t-tests. The activPAL showed good classification accuracy for sitting (ROC-AUC = 0.84) and fair classification accuracy for standing and walking (0.76 and 0.73, respectively). Time spent in sit/lie and stand was overestimated by 5.9% (95% CI = 0.6-11.1%) and 14.8% (11.6-17.9%), respectively; walking was underestimated by 10.0% (-12.9-7.0%). Total number of breaks in SB were significantly overestimated (55 ± 27 over the course of the protocol; p < .01). The activPAL performed well when classifying postures in young children. However, the activPAL has difficulty classifying other postures, such as kneeling. In addition, when predicting time spent in different postures and total number of breaks in SB the activPAL appeared not to be accurate.

