Validation of activPAL defined sedentary time and breaks in sedentary time in 4- to 6-year-olds

Xanne Janssen1, Dylan P Cliff, John J Reilly

  • 1Interdisciplinary Educational Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

Pediatric Exercise Science
|September 11, 2013
PubMed

Insights

The activPAL device accurately classifies sitting in young children but overestimates sedentary behavior breaks. It shows fair accuracy for standing and walking, with some inaccuracies in posture and break detection.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Kinesiology
  • Pediatric Health

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of physical activity and sedentary behavior is crucial for understanding child health.
  • Wearable sensors like activPAL are commonly used to assess physical activity in children, but their accuracy needs validation in this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the classification accuracy of the activPAL device for sedentary behavior (SB) and posture in 4- to 6-year-old children.
  • To assess the device's accuracy in measuring total time spent sedentary and the total number of breaks in SB.

Main Methods:

  • Forty children aged 4-6 years participated in a laboratory protocol with direct observation of posture (sit/lie, stand, walk, other).
  • Posture classification was performed using activPAL software, with accuracy evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and ROC-AUC.
  • Paired sample t-tests compared activPAL data with direct observation for time spent in postures and SB breaks.

Main Results:

  • The activPAL demonstrated good classification accuracy for sitting (ROC-AUC = 0.84) and fair accuracy for standing (0.76) and walking (0.73).
  • Time spent sitting/lying and standing was overestimated by 5.9% and 14.8%, respectively; walking was underestimated by 10.0%.
  • The total number of sedentary behavior breaks was significantly overestimated by the activPAL (55 ± 27 breaks; p < .01).

Conclusions:

  • The activPAL shows good performance in classifying basic postures like sitting in young children.
  • The device struggles with classifying less common postures (e.g., kneeling) and exhibits inaccuracies in quantifying time spent in different postures and sedentary breaks.
  • While useful, the activPAL's limitations in accuracy for specific postures and sedentary behavior metrics should be considered when used with young children.

Related Concept Videos